UCLA

24-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

70.8%UCLA

29.2%Minnesota

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUCLA -4.0

PROJECTED TOTAL143.3

MODEL MONEYLINEUCLA -242

Minnesota

15-18

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUCLA 74

Projected Total143.3

Projected ScoreMinnesota 70

Team Comparison

UCLAMetricMinnesota

63MMH Power Index50.5

115.9Offensive Efficiency109.1

106.9Defensive Efficiency107.7

9.0Net Efficiency1.4

5.1Strength of Schedule3.2

8.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.6

66.5Tempo63.6

53.5%Effective FG%54.1%

13.4%Turnover Rate16.5%

30.7%Offensive Rebound %26.5%

33.8%Free Throw Rate36.9%

6.0Average Margin0.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UCLA HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY70.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUCLA holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.0–50.5), offensive efficiency (115.9–109.1), defensive efficiency (106.9–107.7), net efficiency (9.0–1.4).

Minnesota COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (54.1–53.5), free throw rate (36.9–33.8).

Final

UCLA

73—78

Minnesota

Minnesota by 5 • 55.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UCLATEAM STATMinnesota

29-57FG29-50

51.0%FG%58.0%

10-243PT12-23

42.0%3PT%52.0%

5-6FT8-9

83.0%FT%89.0%

30Rebounds20

10Offensive Rebounds2

27Assists24

6Turnovers3

3Steals4

—Blocks5

12Fouls8

Player Box Score

UCLA

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Tyler Bilodeau	F	36	13-21	4-7	2-2	8	2	0	32
Eric Dailey Jr.	G	32	8-10	1-1	1-1	6	2	0	18
Skyy Clark	G	33	6-9	4-7	1-2	3	5	1	17
Donovan Dent	G	38	1-6	0-2	1-1	5	15	1	3
Jamar Brown	G	24	1-3	1-2	0-0	1	2	0	3
Trent Perry	G	26	0-7	0-5	0-0	1	1	1	0
Xavier Booker	F	10	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0
Eric Freeny	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Minnesota

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Bobby Durkin	F	40	7-12	7-11	2-2	1	3	0	1	23
Cade Tyson	G	37	8-12	3-5	2-2	3	3	1	1	21
Langston Reynolds	G	37	8-14	1-3	4-4	3	6	0	0	21
Isaac Asuma	G	39	6-9	1-3	0-0	6	3	0	2	13
Grayson Grove	F	38	0-2	0-0	0-1	6	7	3	1	0
Kai Shinholster	G	9	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	2	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

55.6Possessions55.6

131.3Offensive Efficiency140.3

140.3Defensive Efficiency131.3

-9.0Net Efficiency9.0

59.6%Effective FG%70.0%

61.0%True Shooting %71.9%

10.7%Turnover Rate5.4%

10.5%Free Throw Rate18.0%

42.1%3-Point Rate46.0%

4.50Assist / Turnover8.00

Game Summary

Minnesota won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 55.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, True Shooting %, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.