Purdue logo

Purdue

30-9
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
61.3%Purdue
38.7%Ohio State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPurdue -1.7
PROJECTED TOTAL154.6
MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -158
Ohio State logo

Ohio State

21-13
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePurdue 78
Projected Total154.6
Projected ScoreOhio State 76

Team Comparison

73.2MMH Power Index64.5
124.8Offensive Efficiency118.1
107.8Defensive Efficiency108.1
17.0Net Efficiency10.0
7.6Strength of Schedule6.4
11.8Last 10 Net Efficiency6.3
65.4Tempo67.2
57.8%Effective FG%56.9%
13.7%Turnover Rate15.3%
36.2%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
29.1%Free Throw Rate38.3%
11.1Average Margin6.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY61.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
101
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–64.5), offensive efficiency (124.8–118.1), defensive efficiency (107.8–108.1), net efficiency (17.0–10.0).
Ohio State COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (38.3–29.1).
Final
Purdue logo
Purdue
7482
Ohio State logo
Ohio State
Ohio State by 861.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PurdueTEAM STATOhio State
28-63FG24-47
44.0%FG%51.0%
11-293PT9-24
38.0%3PT%38.0%
7-10FT25-32
70.0%FT%78.0%
29Rebounds36
10Offensive Rebounds10
13Assists9
6Turnovers7
5Steals3
Blocks3
23Fouls17

Player Box Score

Purdue
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Braden SmithG367-193-83-407200020
Trey Kaufman-RennF288-120-03-590000019
Fletcher LoyerG325-105-90-042100015
C.J. CoxG295-93-70-021000013
Jack BenterG231-30-11-13120003
Oscar CluffC191-30-00-05000002
Gicarri HarrisG131-10-00-01000002
Omer MayerG110-40-20-01100000
Liam MurphyF50-20-20-01100000
Daniel JacobsenC40-00-00-01000000
Ohio State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
John Mobley Jr.G368-155-110-023100021
Bruce ThorntonG376-93-65-752000020
Amare BynumF274-61-35-650010014
Devin RoyalF312-80-28-992110012
Christoph TillyC191-30-05-85000007
Taison ChatmanG232-50-22-21110006
Ivan NjegovanC191-10-00-06101002
Gabe CuppsG80-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

61.5Possessions61.5
120.3Offensive Efficiency133.3
133.3Defensive Efficiency120.3
-13.0Net Efficiency13.0
53.2%Effective FG%60.6%
54.6%True Shooting %65.9%
9.4%Turnover Rate11.8%
15.9%Free Throw Rate68.1%
46.0%3-Point Rate51.1%
2.17Assist / Turnover1.29
Game Summary
Ohio State won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 61.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.