BYU

23-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

44.0%BYU

56.0%Cincinnati

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCincinnati -2.1

PROJECTED TOTAL151.6

MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -127

Cincinnati

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBYU 75

Projected Total151.6

Projected ScoreCincinnati 77

Team Comparison

BYUMetricCincinnati

63.9MMH Power Index61.5

118.3Offensive Efficiency105.3

106.8Defensive Efficiency97.3

11.5Net Efficiency8.0

6.5Strength of Schedule5.1

-2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency14.4

70.6Tempo69.4

54.7%Effective FG%50.6%

15.2%Turnover Rate17.0%

33.7%Offensive Rebound %30.6%

35.4%Free Throw Rate30.7%

8.1Average Margin5.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

BYU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY56.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBYU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.9–61.5), offensive efficiency (118.3–105.3), net efficiency (11.5–8.0), strength of schedule (6.5–5.1).

Cincinnati COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (97.3–106.8), recent form (14.4–-2.2).

Final

BYU

68—90

Cincinnati

Cincinnati by 22 • 71.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BYUTEAM STATCincinnati

24-58FG32-64

41.0%FG%50.0%

7-243PT10-23

29.0%3PT%43.0%

13-19FT16-22

68.0%FT%73.0%

34Rebounds36

10Offensive Rebounds10

8Assists24

15Turnovers7

2Steals10

2Blocks6

17Fouls17

Player Box Score

BYU

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
AJ Dybantsa	F	38	7-21	1-8	8-11	6	6	0	0	23
Robert Wright III	G	32	8-16	1-4	4-4	1	0	1	0	21
Aleksej Kostic	G	29	5-9	4-7	0-0	3	0	0	0	14
Kennard Davis Jr.	F	21	2-5	1-3	1-2	1	0	0	1	6
Keba Keita	F	21	1-1	0-0	0-2	7	1	0	1	2
Abdullah Ahmed	C	11	1-3	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Mihailo Boškovic	F	15	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Dominique Diomande	F	13	0-0	0-0	0-0	5	0	1	0	0
Khadim Mboup	F	12	0-2	0-1	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
Tyler Mrus	F	8	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Cincinnati

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jizzle James	G	36	6-10	3-7	3-4	1	2	3	0	18
Jalen Celestine	G	33	7-9	4-6	0-0	3	1	0	2	18
Moustapha Thiam	C	32	6-12	1-1	3-5	9	1	0	2	16
Baba Miller	F	32	5-10	1-3	4-6	12	5	0	1	15
Day Day Thomas	G	28	3-10	1-4	5-5	2	6	3	1	12
Sencire Harris	G	13	3-5	0-0	0-0	2	3	3	0	6
Keyshuan Tillery	G	17	2-7	0-2	1-2	2	6	1	0	5
Halvine Dzellat	C	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Grant Darbyshire	G	1	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.8Possessions71.8

94.7Offensive Efficiency125.3

125.3Defensive Efficiency94.7

-30.6Net Efficiency30.6

47.4%Effective FG%57.8%

50.7%True Shooting %60.4%

20.8%Turnover Rate9.8%

32.8%Free Throw Rate34.4%

41.4%3-Point Rate35.9%

0.53Assist / Turnover3.43

Game Summary

Cincinnati won by 22 points. The game played at approximately 71.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.