Grambling

14-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

14.2%Grambling

85.8%Ole Miss

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADOle Miss -10.7

PROJECTED TOTAL147.4

MODEL MONEYLINEOle Miss -604

Ole Miss

15-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGrambling 68

Projected Total147.4

Projected ScoreOle Miss 79

Team Comparison

GramblingMetricOle Miss

41.4MMH Power Index53

100.7Offensive Efficiency109.2

100.4Defensive Efficiency109.5

0.3Net Efficiency-0.3

-5.7Strength of Schedule5.4

-0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.3

69.9Tempo69.5

49.2%Effective FG%50.6%

20.9%Turnover Rate14.0%

30.4%Offensive Rebound %28.0%

42.2%Free Throw Rate33.8%

0.2Average Margin-0.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Grambling HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY85.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrambling holds the advantage in defensive efficiency (100.4–109.5), net efficiency (0.3–-0.3), recent form (-0.4–-2.3), offensive rebounding (30.4–28.0).

Ole Miss COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (53.0–41.4), offensive efficiency (109.2–100.7), strength of schedule (5.4–-5.7).

Final

Grambling

64—66

Ole Miss

Ole Miss by 2 • 70.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

GramblingTEAM STATOle Miss

21-45FG23-65

47.0%FG%35.0%

9-193PT6-26

47.0%3PT%23.0%

13-20FT14-18

65.0%FT%78.0%

39Rebounds33

5Offensive Rebounds10

10Assists13

22Turnovers6

5Steals14

7Blocks5

18Fouls20

Player Box Score

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Mikale Stevenson	G	30	5-11	1-4	5-5	5	4	1	0	16
Kintavious Dozier	G	35	6-12	2-5	1-3	4	0	2	0	15
Ernest Ross	Forward	33	4-6	1-2	5-6	8	1	0	4	14
James Flippin	F	19	4-5	4-4	0-2	0	0	0	0	12
Antwan Burnett	G	37	2-4	1-1	0-0	9	2	1	0	5
PJ Eason	F	20	0-2	0-0	1-2	2	1	1	3	1
P.J. Edwards	G	16	0-2	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	0	1
Cbo Newton	G	7	0-2	0-2	0-0	2	2	0	0	0
Emeka Nnaji	Forward	3	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Ole Miss

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dre Davis	Guard	26	4-7	2-3	3-4	4	1	0	0	13
Sean Pedulla	Guard	35	4-12	1-6	3-3	1	4	3	0	12
Jaemyn Brakefield	Forward	27	4-12	1-5	2-2	11	2	0	2	11
Jaylen Murray	Guard	35	3-7	0-3	4-4	2	1	2	2	10
Matthew Murrell	Guard	33	4-11	0-3	0-3	4	4	7	0	8
Malik Dia	F	12	2-6	2-3	2-2	3	1	0	0	8
Davon Barnes	Not Available	18	2-5	0-1	0-0	3	0	2	0	4
Eduardo Klafke	G	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Mikeal Brown-Jones	Forward	5	0-3	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	1	0
Ja'Von Benson	Forward	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.6Possessions70.6

90.7Offensive Efficiency93.5

93.5Defensive Efficiency90.7

-2.8Net Efficiency2.8

56.7%Effective FG%40.0%

58.7%True Shooting %44.9%

30.8%Turnover Rate8.6%

44.4%Free Throw Rate27.7%

42.2%3-Point Rate40.0%

0.45Assist / Turnover2.17

Game Summary

Ole Miss won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 70.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, Effective FG%, Free Throw Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.