
Nebraska
28-7GAME THAT MATTERSAT
48.4%Nebraska
51.6%UCLA
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUCLA -0.4
PROJECTED TOTAL146.6
MODEL MONEYLINEUCLA -107

UCLA
24-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNebraska 73
Projected Total146.6
Projected ScoreUCLA 73
Team Comparison
67MMH Power Index63
114.4Offensive Efficiency115.9
98.3Defensive Efficiency106.9
16.1Net Efficiency9.0
6.1Strength of Schedule5.1
6.8Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0
67.3Tempo66.5
55.6%Effective FG%53.5%
14.4%Turnover Rate13.4%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
26.9%Free Throw Rate33.8%
10.8Average Margin6.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Nebraska HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY51.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNebraska holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.0–63.0), defensive efficiency (98.3–106.9), net efficiency (16.1–9.0), strength of schedule (6.1–5.1).
UCLA COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (115.9–114.4), recent form (8.0–6.8), ball security (13.4–14.4).