
Creighton
15-18GAME THAT MATTERSAT
32.2%Creighton
67.8%Butler
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADButler -5.6
PROJECTED TOTAL156.7
MODEL MONEYLINEButler -211

Butler
16-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCreighton 76
Projected Total156.7
Projected ScoreButler 81
Team Comparison
50.6MMH Power Index52.7
109.0Offensive Efficiency111.7
109.5Defensive Efficiency109.1
-0.5Net Efficiency2.6
5.1Strength of Schedule3.1
-5.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.5
68.9Tempo71.1
53.0%Effective FG%51.2%
16.6%Turnover Rate15.9%
26.6%Offensive Rebound %34.4%
29.0%Free Throw Rate42.9%
-0.3Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Butler HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY67.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMButler holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.7–50.6), offensive efficiency (111.7–109.0), defensive efficiency (109.1–109.5), net efficiency (2.6–-0.5).
Creighton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.1–3.1), recent form (-5.2–-8.5), shooting efficiency (53.0–51.2).