Wisconsin logo

Wisconsin

24-11
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
18.6%Wisconsin
81.4%Purdue
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPurdue -9.6
PROJECTED TOTAL159.0
MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -438
Purdue logo

Purdue

30-9
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWisconsin 75
Projected Total159.0
Projected ScorePurdue 84

Team Comparison

64.5MMH Power Index73.2
118.6Offensive Efficiency124.8
108.8Defensive Efficiency107.8
9.8Net Efficiency17.0
6.7Strength of Schedule7.6
5.6Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8
69.9Tempo65.4
54.6%Effective FG%57.8%
12.8%Turnover Rate13.7%
28.7%Offensive Rebound %36.2%
32.5%Free Throw Rate29.1%
6.9Average Margin11.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY81.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
92
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–64.5), offensive efficiency (124.8–118.6), defensive efficiency (107.8–108.8), net efficiency (17.0–9.8).
Wisconsin COUNTERS WITHball security (12.8–13.7), free throw rate (32.5–29.1).
Final
Wisconsin logo
Wisconsin
9793
Purdue logo
Purdue
Wisconsin by 465.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

WisconsinTEAM STATPurdue
29-52FG34-67
56.0%FG%51.0%
18-343PT11-25
53.0%3PT%44.0%
21-24FT14-19
88.0%FT%74.0%
22Rebounds34
7Offensive Rebounds16
19Assists20
8Turnovers7
4Steals5
1Blocks5
19Fouls18

Player Box Score

Wisconsin
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
John BlackwellG387-135-106-741100025
Nick BoydG338-131-36-735000023
Austin RappF324-84-85-633100017
Aleksas BieliauskasF365-84-52-221100016
Braeden CarringtonG202-52-52-22500008
Andrew RohdeG302-32-30-03400006
Hayden JonesG71-20-00-00011002
Will GarlockF40-00-00-00000000
Purdue
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Fletcher LoyerG368-136-91-132200023
Braden SmithG378-182-72-239210020
Trey Kaufman-RennF237-140-03-533010017
Oscar CluffC273-40-04-582030010
Omer MayerG143-71-40-00100007
Daniel JacobsenC132-20-03-45000007
C.J. CoxG292-71-30-05100005
Jack BenterG171-21-21-22210004
Gicarri HarrisG40-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

65.7Possessions65.7
147.6Offensive Efficiency141.6
141.6Defensive Efficiency147.6
6.1Net Efficiency-6.1
73.1%Effective FG%59.0%
76.5%True Shooting %61.2%
12.4%Turnover Rate10.4%
46.2%Free Throw Rate28.4%
65.4%3-Point Rate37.3%
2.38Assist / Turnover2.86
Game Summary
Wisconsin won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 65.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.