Vanderbilt

27-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

38.3%Vanderbilt

61.7%Tennessee

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTennessee -3.7

PROJECTED TOTAL157.6

MODEL MONEYLINETennessee -161

Tennessee

25-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 77

Projected Total157.6

Projected ScoreTennessee 81

Team Comparison

VanderbiltMetricTennessee

68.9MMH Power Index68.6

120.9Offensive Efficiency115.8

105.7Defensive Efficiency102.1

15.2Net Efficiency13.7

7.4Strength of Schedule7.8

2.7Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3

70.9Tempo68.1

55.3%Effective FG%51.6%

13.5%Turnover Rate17.3%

30.8%Offensive Rebound %44.5%

39.3%Free Throw Rate38.6%

10.8Average Margin9.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY61.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–68.6), offensive efficiency (120.9–115.8), net efficiency (15.2–13.7), shooting efficiency (55.3–51.6).

Tennessee COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.1–105.7), strength of schedule (7.8–7.4), recent form (3.3–2.7).

Final

Vanderbilt

86—82

Tennessee

Vanderbilt by 4 • 73.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

VanderbiltTEAM STATTennessee

27-51FG31-70

53.0%FG%44.0%

5-103PT6-24

50.0%3PT%25.0%

27-32FT14-21

84.0%FT%67.0%

31Rebounds40

7Offensive Rebounds18

10Assists15

14Turnovers11

8Steals7

2Blocks6

19Fouls21

Player Box Score

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyler Tanner	G	35	7-9	2-2	9-10	3	3	2	0	25
AK Okereke	F	22	5-8	1-2	6-9	4	3	0	0	17
Duke Miles	G	30	3-10	0-1	7-7	4	2	4	0	13
Chandler Bing	G	24	4-6	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	9
Devin McGlockton	F	30	3-6	0-1	2-2	4	1	0	1	8
Tyler Nickel	F	29	2-3	1-2	2-2	5	1	2	0	7
Jalen Washington	C	24	3-7	0-0	1-2	8	0	0	1	7
Jayden Leverett	C	4	0-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Tyler Harris	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Tennessee

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Amari Evans	G	32	9-18	2-6	4-7	6	0	3	0	24
J.P. Estrella	F	23	9-12	1-2	1-2	10	2	0	1	20
Ja'Kobi Gillespie	G	37	5-22	1-11	6-7	2	4	1	0	17
Felix Okpara	F	32	3-4	0-1	2-2	10	0	0	4	8
Bishop Boswell	G	29	2-7	1-2	0-0	0	4	2	0	5
Ethan Burg	G	16	2-3	0-1	0-1	0	2	0	0	4
Troy Henderson	G	3	1-2	1-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	3
Amaree Abram	G	3	0-1	0-0	1-2	1	0	1	0	1
DeWayne Brown II	F	13	0-1	0-0	0-0	4	2	0	1	0
Jaylen Carey	F	12	0-0	0-0	0-0	5	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

73.1Possessions73.1

117.6Offensive Efficiency112.2

112.2Defensive Efficiency117.6

5.5Net Efficiency-5.5

57.8%Effective FG%48.6%

65.0%True Shooting %51.3%

19.1%Turnover Rate15.1%

62.7%Free Throw Rate30.0%

19.6%3-Point Rate34.3%

0.71Assist / Turnover1.36

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 73.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.