Kansas State logo

Kansas State

12-20
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
10.3%Kansas State
89.7%Kansas
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKansas -14.8
PROJECTED TOTAL155.3
MODEL MONEYLINEKansas -871
Kansas logo

Kansas

24-11
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreKansas State 70
Projected Total155.3
Projected ScoreKansas 85

Team Comparison

47.1MMH Power Index62
107.8Offensive Efficiency109.2
110.9Defensive Efficiency100.3
-3.1Net Efficiency8.9
5.5Strength of Schedule8.9
-14.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.3
73.8Tempo68.8
53.5%Effective FG%51.4%
17.4%Turnover Rate15.6%
29.4%Offensive Rebound %29.0%
27.4%Free Throw Rate33.0%
-2.3Average Margin6.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Kansas HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
92
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKansas holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.0–47.1), offensive efficiency (109.2–107.8), defensive efficiency (100.3–110.9), net efficiency (8.9–-3.1).
Kansas State COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (53.5–51.4), offensive rebounding (29.4–29.0).
Final
Kansas State logo
Kansas State
8585
Kansas logo
Kansas
Tied 78.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Kansas StateTEAM STATKansas
30-67FG30-67
45.0%FG%45.0%
8-223PT8-22
36.0%3PT%36.0%
17-21FT17-21
81.0%FT%81.0%
28Rebounds28
7Offensive Rebounds7
9Assists9
8Turnovers8
8Steals8
2Blocks2
21Fouls21

Player Box Score

Kansas State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Nate JohnsonG377-152-55-573200021
P.J. HaggertyG348-180-35-652300021
Khamari McGriffF256-130-05-870120017
Andrej KosticF183-43-42-230000011
David CastilloG362-62-40-00100006
Taj ManningF293-50-10-03110006
C.J. JonesG151-41-30-00010003
Elias RapiequeF60-20-20-01200000
Kansas
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Nate JohnsonG377-152-55-573200021
P.J. HaggertyG348-180-35-652300021
Khamari McGriffF256-130-05-870120017
Andrej KosticF183-43-42-230000011
David CastilloG362-62-40-00100006
Taj ManningF293-50-10-03110006
C.J. JonesG151-41-30-00010003
Elias RapiequeF60-20-20-01200000

Advanced Game Stats

78.0Possessions78.0
109.0Offensive Efficiency109.0
109.0Defensive Efficiency109.0
0.0Net Efficiency0.0
50.7%Effective FG%50.7%
55.2%True Shooting %55.2%
10.3%Turnover Rate10.3%
31.3%Free Throw Rate31.3%
32.8%3-Point Rate32.8%
1.13Assist / Turnover1.13
Game Summary
Neither team finished level. The game played at approximately 78.0 possessions.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.