Michigan State logo

Michigan State

27-8
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
14.9%Michigan State
85.1%Michigan
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMichigan -12.4
PROJECTED TOTAL154.8
MODEL MONEYLINEMichigan -571
Michigan logo

Michigan

36-3
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMichigan State 71
Projected Total154.8
Projected ScoreMichigan 84

Team Comparison

69.8MMH Power Index80.9
117.0Offensive Efficiency122.3
101.5Defensive Efficiency97.0
15.5Net Efficiency25.3
7.2Strength of Schedule8.7
9.5Last 10 Net Efficiency17.2
67.3Tempo71.8
54.1%Effective FG%58.8%
17.2%Turnover Rate16.4%
37.7%Offensive Rebound %34.6%
36.6%Free Throw Rate38.9%
10.5Average Margin18.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Michigan HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY85.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
101
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMichigan holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (80.9–69.8), offensive efficiency (122.3–117.0), defensive efficiency (97.0–101.5), net efficiency (25.3–15.5).
Michigan State COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (37.7–34.6).
Final
Michigan State logo
Michigan State
8080
Michigan logo
Michigan
Tied 71.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Michigan StateTEAM STATMichigan
29-65FG29-65
45.0%FG%45.0%
6-183PT6-18
33.0%3PT%33.0%
16-20FT16-20
80.0%FT%80.0%
32Rebounds32
10Offensive Rebounds10
16Assists16
7Turnovers7
5Steals5
3Blocks3
22Fouls22

Player Box Score

Michigan State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jaxon KohlerF3310-132-41-183010023
Jeremy Fears Jr.G375-132-310-1229100022
Carson CooperC298-140-03-462100019
Kur TengG232-82-52-32110008
Coen CarrF323-80-30-07000006
Jordan ScottF331-70-30-02122002
Cam WardF90-20-00-01000000
Denham WojcikG30-00-00-00000000
Jesse McCullochF10-00-00-00000000
Michigan
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jaxon KohlerF3310-132-41-183010023
Jeremy Fears Jr.G375-132-310-1229100022
Carson CooperC298-140-03-462100019
Kur TengG232-82-52-32110008
Coen CarrF323-80-30-07000006
Jordan ScottF331-70-30-02122002
Cam WardF90-20-00-01000000
Denham WojcikG30-00-00-00000000
Jesse McCullochF10-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

71.5Possessions71.5
111.9Offensive Efficiency111.9
111.9Defensive Efficiency111.9
0.0Net Efficiency0.0
49.2%Effective FG%49.2%
53.7%True Shooting %53.7%
9.8%Turnover Rate9.8%
30.8%Free Throw Rate30.8%
27.7%3-Point Rate27.7%
2.29Assist / Turnover2.29
Game Summary
Neither team finished level. The game played at approximately 71.5 possessions.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.