Miami (OH)

32-2

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

42.6%Miami (OH)

57.4%Toledo

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADToledo -0.8

PROJECTED TOTAL166.1

MODEL MONEYLINEToledo -135

Toledo

19-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMiami (OH) 83

Projected Total166.1

Projected ScoreToledo 83

Team Comparison

Miami (OH)MetricToledo

60.7MMH Power Index58.8

123.1Offensive Efficiency116.0

103.7Defensive Efficiency109.6

19.4Net Efficiency6.4

-5.6Strength of Schedule2.3

5.5Last 10 Net Efficiency10.2

72.8Tempo69.8

60.6%Effective FG%55.1%

14.2%Turnover Rate14.6%

26.3%Offensive Rebound %30.4%

40.1%Free Throw Rate30.3%

14.1Average Margin4.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Miami (OH) HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami (OH) holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (60.7–58.8), offensive efficiency (123.1–116.0), defensive efficiency (103.7–109.6), net efficiency (19.4–6.4).

Toledo COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.3–-5.6), recent form (10.2–5.5), offensive rebounding (30.4–26.3).

Final

Miami (OH)

87—73

Toledo

Miami (OH) by 14 • 69.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Miami (OH)TEAM STATToledo

34-63FG24-62

54.0%FG%39.0%

12-313PT8-18

39.0%3PT%44.0%

7-8FT17-20

88.0%FT%85.0%

36Rebounds33

8Offensive Rebounds12

16Assists10

10Turnovers11

7Steals5

5Blocks1

17Fouls11

Player Box Score

Miami (OH)

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Antwone Woolfolk	F	25	8-13	2-3	3-4	6	0	0	2	21
Brant Byers	G	37	7-14	4-10	2-2	8	1	2	1	20
Eian Elmer	G	31	7-10	2-4	0-0	4	4	2	1	16
Peter Suder	G	36	3-7	1-3	0-0	5	6	2	1	7
Luke Skaljac	G	28	3-6	1-3	0-0	3	4	0	0	7
Almar Atlason	F	15	2-5	2-5	0-0	3	1	0	0	6
Justin Kirby	G	11	2-3	0-1	2-2	3	0	1	0	6
Kyle Waltz	F	9	1-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Tyler Robbins	F	8	1-3	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	2

Toledo

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Sonny Wilson	G	39	8-13	1-2	3-5	4	5	2	0	20
Sean Craig	F	33	5-12	3-4	3-3	13	0	0	0	16
Leroy Blyden Jr.	G	34	4-14	3-9	1-1	3	1	1	0	12
Austin Parks	C	28	2-4	0-0	6-6	5	1	0	1	10
Mynor Strong	G	19	2-4	1-2	2-2	1	1	1	0	7
Jaylan Ouwinga	F	12	1-4	0-0	2-3	1	0	0	0	4
Will James Jr.	G	11	2-5	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	4
Kyler Vanderjagt	G	24	0-6	0-1	0-0	1	1	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.7Possessions69.7

124.8Offensive Efficiency104.7

104.7Defensive Efficiency124.8

20.1Net Efficiency-20.1

63.5%Effective FG%45.2%

65.1%True Shooting %51.0%

14.5%Turnover Rate15.6%

12.7%Free Throw Rate32.3%

49.2%3-Point Rate29.0%

1.60Assist / Turnover0.91

Game Summary

Miami (OH) won by 14 points. The game played at approximately 69.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.