Tulane

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

20.0%Tulane

80.0%North Texas

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNorth Texas -10.2

PROJECTED TOTAL143.4

MODEL MONEYLINENorth Texas -400

North Texas

19-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTulane 67

Projected Total143.4

Projected ScoreNorth Texas 77

Team Comparison

TulaneMetricNorth Texas

44.3MMH Power Index52.2

105.3Offensive Efficiency104.1

109.9Defensive Efficiency99.1

-4.6Net Efficiency5.0

2.7Strength of Schedule-1.3

-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency4.8

68.7Tempo68.1

49.6%Effective FG%47.6%

15.6%Turnover Rate16.7%

22.8%Offensive Rebound %33.6%

44.8%Free Throw Rate41.1%

-3.2Average Margin3.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

North Texas HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY80.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNorth Texas holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.2–44.3), defensive efficiency (99.1–109.9), net efficiency (5.0–-4.6), recent form (4.8–-10.3).

Tulane COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (105.3–104.1), strength of schedule (2.7–-1.3), shooting efficiency (49.6–47.6).

Final

Tulane

77—71

North Texas

Tulane by 6 • 65.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TulaneTEAM STATNorth Texas

26-56FG23-54

46.0%FG%43.0%

8-223PT4-12

36.0%3PT%33.0%

17-24FT21-29

71.0%FT%72.0%

33Rebounds38

11Offensive Rebounds15

10Assists12

10Turnovers12

8Steals5

7Blocks5

21Fouls20

Player Box Score

Tulane

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rowan Brumbaugh	G	37	5-10	0-2	7-8	2	2	1	0	17
Asher Woods	G	36	6-9	2-3	2-2	3	1	0	0	16
Scotty Middleton	F	32	5-7	4-6	1-1	6	1	0	0	15
Tyler Ringgold	F	28	4-9	0-1	4-8	5	4	3	2	12
Curtis Williams Jr.	G	33	4-14	2-8	1-1	2	0	3	2	11
KJ Greene	G	7	1-2	0-0	2-2	2	0	0	0	4
Percy Daniels	C	12	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	2	2
Luke Rasmussen	G	9	0-3	0-2	0-2	1	1	0	0	0
Josiah Moore	G	6	0-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	1	1	0

North Texas

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
David Terrell Jr.	G	34	8-11	0-0	5-6	2	6	0	1	21
Je'Shawn Stevenson	G	33	5-15	2-6	8-9	7	1	2	0	20
Reece Robinson	F	26	2-6	0-0	4-6	6	2	0	0	8
Dylan Arnett	F	19	3-8	0-0	0-2	6	1	0	1	6
Cahmai Crosby	G	15	2-4	2-4	0-0	1	0	0	0	6
Buddy Hammer Jr.	F	19	1-3	0-0	1-2	2	1	2	2	3
EJ Horton	G	10	1-2	0-1	1-2	1	0	0	0	3
Cole Franklin	G	21	0-2	0-1	2-2	5	1	1	0	2
Curtis Stinson Jr.	G	10	1-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Demarion Watson	G	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	1	0
Josiah Shackleford	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.6Possessions65.6

117.4Offensive Efficiency108.2

108.2Defensive Efficiency117.4

9.1Net Efficiency-9.1

53.6%Effective FG%46.3%

57.1%True Shooting %52.4%

15.1%Turnover Rate18.5%

42.9%Free Throw Rate53.7%

39.3%3-Point Rate22.2%

1.00Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Tulane won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 65.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.