Nebraska

28-7

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

23.1%Nebraska

76.9%Purdue

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -7.2

PROJECTED TOTAL149.2

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -333

Purdue

30-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNebraska 71

Projected Total149.2

Projected ScorePurdue 78

Team Comparison

NebraskaMetricPurdue

67MMH Power Index73.2

114.4Offensive Efficiency124.8

98.3Defensive Efficiency107.8

16.1Net Efficiency17.0

6.1Strength of Schedule7.6

6.8Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8

67.3Tempo65.4

55.6%Effective FG%57.8%

14.4%Turnover Rate13.7%

26.3%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

26.9%Free Throw Rate29.1%

10.8Average Margin11.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY76.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–67.0), offensive efficiency (124.8–114.4), net efficiency (17.0–16.1), strength of schedule (7.6–6.1).

Nebraska COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (98.3–107.8).

Final

Nebraska

68—104

Purdue

Purdue by 36 • 70.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

NebraskaTEAM STATPurdue

26-54FG41-65

48.0%FG%63.0%

6-273PT19-33

22.0%3PT%58.0%

10-11FT3-6

91.0%FT%50.0%

20Rebounds33

4Offensive Rebounds9

15Assists32

17Turnovers10

9Steals11

2Blocks3

10Fouls10

Player Box Score

Nebraska

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Connor Essegian	G	22	6-13	3-10	2-3	5	3	1	0	17
Juwan Gary	Forward	29	4-10	0-5	2-2	1	0	0	0	10
Brice Williams	Guard	29	2-8	0-2	5-5	5	4	1	0	9
Berke Buyuktuncel	F	25	3-5	2-4	0-0	3	1	4	1	8
Sam Hoiberg	G	23	3-3	1-1	0-0	1	4	2	0	7
Ahron Ulis	Guard	15	3-4	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	6
Rollie Worster	Guard	15	2-4	0-2	1-1	2	1	0	0	5
Braxton Meah	Center	15	2-2	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	1	4
Andrew Morgan	Forward	17	1-3	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	2
Gavin Griffiths	G	6	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Cale Jacobsen	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jeffrey Grace III	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
C.J. Cox	G	23	9-11	5-7	0-0	4	2	4	0	23
Fletcher Loyer	G	24	7-12	5-6	0-0	0	1	0	0	19
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	27	7-9	0-0	1-1	6	7	1	0	15
Myles Colvin	G	18	5-9	4-8	0-0	1	0	0	0	14
Braden Smith	G	30	3-8	2-6	0-0	3	14	2	1	8
Gicarri Harris	G	15	2-3	2-3	0-0	2	4	1	0	6
Raleigh Burgess	F	10	2-2	0-0	1-1	2	0	1	1	5
Brian Waddell	F	6	2-3	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	5
Caleb Furst	Forward	20	1-2	0-0	0-2	3	1	1	0	2
Camden Heide	F	14	1-3	0-2	0-0	3	2	1	0	2
Will Berg	C	6	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	1	2
Sam King	F	3	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Jace Rayl	G	2	0-1	0-0	1-2	0	0	0	0	1
Jack Lusk	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.6Possessions70.6

96.3Offensive Efficiency147.3

147.3Defensive Efficiency96.3

-51.0Net Efficiency51.0

53.7%Effective FG%77.7%

57.4%True Shooting %76.6%

23.5%Turnover Rate14.5%

20.4%Free Throw Rate9.2%

50.0%3-Point Rate50.8%

0.88Assist / Turnover3.20

Game Summary

Purdue won by 36 points. The game played at approximately 70.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.