
UCLA
24-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
80.2%UCLA
19.8%Rutgers
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUCLA -8.5
PROJECTED TOTAL148.3
MODEL MONEYLINEUCLA -405

Rutgers
13-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUCLA 78
Projected Total148.3
Projected ScoreRutgers 70
Team Comparison
63MMH Power Index45.9
115.9Offensive Efficiency104.2
106.9Defensive Efficiency112.2
9.0Net Efficiency-8.0
5.1Strength of Schedule3.9
8.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.6
66.5Tempo67.4
53.5%Effective FG%47.4%
13.4%Turnover Rate15.0%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
33.8%Free Throw Rate36.3%
6.0Average Margin-5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UCLA HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY80.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUCLA holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.0–45.9), offensive efficiency (115.9–104.2), defensive efficiency (106.9–112.2), net efficiency (9.0–-8.0).
Rutgers COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (36.3–33.8).