Boston College

11-20

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

26.5%Boston College

73.5%Notre Dame

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNotre Dame -7.1

PROJECTED TOTAL144.9

MODEL MONEYLINENotre Dame -277

Notre Dame

13-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBoston College 69

Projected Total144.9

Projected ScoreNotre Dame 76

Team Comparison

Boston CollegeMetricNotre Dame

45.1MMH Power Index49.7

100.0Offensive Efficiency110.3

104.8Defensive Efficiency111.2

-4.8Net Efficiency-0.9

4.8Strength of Schedule4.7

-14.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.6

67.4Tempo68.0

47.1%Effective FG%53.0%

15.4%Turnover Rate17.0%

28.1%Offensive Rebound %31.4%

33.2%Free Throw Rate34.7%

-3.3Average Margin-0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Notre Dame HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY73.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNotre Dame holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.7–45.1), offensive efficiency (110.3–100.0), net efficiency (-0.9–-4.8), recent form (-11.6–-14.3).

Boston College COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (104.8–111.2), strength of schedule (4.8–4.7), ball security (15.4–17.0).

Final

Boston College

60—78

Notre Dame

Notre Dame by 18 • 60.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Boston CollegeTEAM STATNotre Dame

22-47FG26-55

47.0%FG%47.0%

10-193PT3-15

53.0%3PT%20.0%

6-6FT23-27

100.0%FT%85.0%

23Rebounds35

7Offensive Rebounds17

10Assists7

18Turnovers10

6Steals13

2Blocks1

23Fouls12

Player Box Score

Boston College

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Donald Hand Jr.	G	35	6-11	5-7	0-0	1	3	1	0	17
Joshua Beadle	G	24	3-7	0-0	3-3	2	1	3	0	9
Elijah Strong	F	22	2-6	1-1	3-3	3	2	0	0	8
Chad Venning	Forward	21	4-6	0-1	0-0	1	2	0	1	8
Chas Kelley III	G	11	3-7	2-4	0-0	0	0	0	0	8
Fred Payne	G	17	2-4	2-3	0-0	1	0	0	0	6
Dion Brown	G	22	1-2	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0	2
Jayden Hastings	F	19	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	1	2
Roger McFarlane	Guard	20	0-2	0-2	0-0	4	0	1	0	0
Luka Toews	G	9	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	2	1	0	0

Notre Dame

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tae Davis	F	33	9-14	0-0	8-9	1	2	0	0	26
Markus Burton	G	33	5-15	1-5	9-10	4	0	4	0	20
Matt Allocco	Guard	31	5-8	1-3	2-3	3	1	3	0	13
Kebba Njie	F	28	3-6	1-1	4-4	9	0	3	0	11
Sir Mohammed	G	14	2-6	0-2	0-1	3	0	2	0	4
Julian Roper II	Guard	19	1-1	0-0	0-0	7	2	1	0	2
Nikita Konstantynovskyi	Forward	11	1-1	0-0	0-0	4	1	0	1	2
Braeden Shrewsberry	G	28	0-4	0-4	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
J.R. Konieczny	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

60.9Possessions60.9

98.5Offensive Efficiency128.1

128.1Defensive Efficiency98.5

-29.6Net Efficiency29.6

57.4%Effective FG%50.0%

60.2%True Shooting %57.5%

29.6%Turnover Rate16.4%

12.8%Free Throw Rate49.1%

40.4%3-Point Rate27.3%

0.56Assist / Turnover0.70

Game Summary

Notre Dame won by 18 points. The game played at approximately 60.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.