
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.7%Queens University
73.3%Winthrop
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWinthrop -9.1
PROJECTED TOTAL169.0
MODEL MONEYLINEWinthrop -275

Winthrop
23-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 80
Projected Total169.0
Projected ScoreWinthrop 89
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index56.2
118.4Offensive Efficiency115.6
117.0Defensive Efficiency104.3
1.4Net Efficiency11.3
0.1Strength of Schedule-3.6
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency2.8
71.4Tempo72.4
56.6%Effective FG%51.2%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.0%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %35.5%
37.6%Free Throw Rate44.4%
0.9Average Margin8.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Winthrop HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY73.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWinthrop holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.2–51.7), defensive efficiency (104.3–117.0), net efficiency (11.3–1.4), recent form (2.8–1.5).
Queens University COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (118.4–115.6), strength of schedule (0.1–-3.6), shooting efficiency (56.6–51.2).