
Texas State
19-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
25.0%Texas State
75.0%Bowling Green
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBowling Green -9.3
PROJECTED TOTAL150.5
MODEL MONEYLINEBowling Green -300

Bowling Green
18-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTexas State 71
Projected Total150.5
Projected ScoreBowling Green 80
Team Comparison
49.4MMH Power Index54.7
107.7Offensive Efficiency112.6
103.4Defensive Efficiency99.1
4.3Net Efficiency13.5
-4.7Strength of Schedule-4.7
9.1Last 10 Net Efficiency1.4
68.6Tempo72.2
51.3%Effective FG%53.4%
18.4%Turnover Rate15.9%
34.3%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
36.0%Free Throw Rate38.7%
2.9Average Margin9.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Bowling Green HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY75.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBowling Green holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.7–49.4), offensive efficiency (112.6–107.7), defensive efficiency (99.1–103.4), net efficiency (13.5–4.3).
Texas State COUNTERS WITHrecent form (9.1–1.4), offensive rebounding (34.3–29.2).