
Fairfield
21-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
58.9%Fairfield
41.1%Penn State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFairfield -2.1
PROJECTED TOTAL151.3
MODEL MONEYLINEFairfield -143

Penn State
12-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFairfield 77
Projected Total151.3
Projected ScorePenn State 75
Team Comparison
50.1MMH Power Index42.3
109.6Offensive Efficiency109.2
105.4Defensive Efficiency117.6
4.2Net Efficiency-8.4
-3.4Strength of Schedule5.3
3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-20.8
67.8Tempo67.5
49.1%Effective FG%53.4%
15.0%Turnover Rate15.6%
36.0%Offensive Rebound %25.6%
28.4%Free Throw Rate34.6%
2.8Average Margin-5.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Fairfield HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY58.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFairfield holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.1–42.3), offensive efficiency (109.6–109.2), defensive efficiency (105.4–117.6), net efficiency (4.2–-8.4).
Penn State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.3–-3.4), shooting efficiency (53.4–49.1), free throw rate (34.6–28.4).