
Troy
22-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
36.0%Troy
64.0%Kent State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKent State -4.1
PROJECTED TOTAL162.1
MODEL MONEYLINEKent State -178

Kent State
24-10MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTroy 79
Projected Total162.1
Projected ScoreKent State 83
Team Comparison
54.1MMH Power Index54.7
112.6Offensive Efficiency113.9
103.9Defensive Efficiency107.6
8.7Net Efficiency6.3
-2.2Strength of Schedule-0.1
2.0Last 10 Net Efficiency2.1
70.4Tempo74.0
52.1%Effective FG%53.0%
17.1%Turnover Rate17.7%
35.3%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
36.8%Free Throw Rate43.5%
6.1Average Margin4.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Kent State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY64.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKent State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.7–54.1), offensive efficiency (113.9–112.6), strength of schedule (-0.1–-2.2), recent form (2.1–2.0).
Troy COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.9–107.6), net efficiency (8.7–6.3), ball security (17.1–17.7).