Western Carolina

15-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

18.9%Western Carolina

81.1%Cincinnati

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCincinnati -10.5

PROJECTED TOTAL149.8

MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -429

Cincinnati

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreWestern Carolina 70

Projected Total149.8

Projected ScoreCincinnati 80

Team Comparison

Western CarolinaMetricCincinnati

53MMH Power Index61.5

112.6Offensive Efficiency105.3

111.0Defensive Efficiency97.3

1.6Net Efficiency8.0

-0.9Strength of Schedule5.1

13.1Last 10 Net Efficiency14.4

69.7Tempo69.4

51.1%Effective FG%50.6%

16.4%Turnover Rate17.0%

36.1%Offensive Rebound %30.6%

30.8%Free Throw Rate30.7%

1.1Average Margin5.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY81.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.5–53.0), defensive efficiency (97.3–111.0), net efficiency (8.0–1.6), strength of schedule (5.1–-0.9).

Western Carolina COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (112.6–105.3), shooting efficiency (51.1–50.6), ball security (16.4–17.0).

Final

Western Carolina

63—94

Cincinnati

Cincinnati by 31 • 80.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Western CarolinaTEAM STATCincinnati

23-64FG32-59

36.0%FG%54.0%

9-273PT10-28

33.0%3PT%36.0%

8-14FT20-30

57.0%FT%67.0%

37Rebounds36

14Offensive Rebounds7

12Assists20

22Turnovers15

8Steals11

1Blocks7

23Fouls15

Player Box Score

Western Carolina

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Cord Stansberry	G	30	9-19	4-9	1-3	3	1	1	0	23
Julien Soumaoro	G	29	5-12	3-8	0-1	5	1	1	0	13
Marcus Kell	F	30	4-12	1-4	3-4	9	2	1	0	12
Tahlan Pettway	G	18	2-4	1-2	0-0	2	3	0	0	5
CJ Hyland	G	17	1-6	0-2	2-2	1	0	0	0	4
Justin Johnson	G	17	1-5	0-2	1-2	2	1	0	0	3
Samuel Dada	F	21	1-5	0-0	0-0	5	1	1	0	2
Abdulai Fanta Kabba	C	11	0-0	0-0	1-2	4	1	0	0	1
Chase McKey	F	15	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	1	1	0	0
Tidjiane Dioumassi	G	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	3	1	0
Fischer Brown	G	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Cincinnati

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Shon Abaev	G	25	7-12	2-6	2-2	2	1	0	0	18
Baba Miller	F	24	7-9	0-2	4-6	10	1	0	0	18
Moustapha Thiam	C	24	6-7	1-2	5-7	5	1	1	1	18
Jordi Rodriguez	G	15	2-4	2-4	4-7	1	2	0	0	10
Day Day Thomas	G	27	3-11	2-5	0-0	3	3	1	2	8
Kerr Kriisa	G	26	2-4	2-4	0-0	3	4	0	0	6
Sencire Harris	G	9	1-1	0-0	4-6	0	2	3	0	6
Keyshuan Tillery	G	14	2-4	0-1	1-2	0	3	1	0	5
Jalen Celestine	G	14	1-3	1-3	0-0	0	1	1	0	3
Tyler McKinley	F	15	1-2	0-0	0-0	5	2	3	2	2
Halvine Dzellat	C	7	0-2	0-1	0-0	4	0	1	2	0

Advanced Game Stats

80.0Possessions80.0

78.8Offensive Efficiency117.5

117.5Defensive Efficiency78.8

-38.7Net Efficiency38.8

43.0%Effective FG%62.7%

44.6%True Shooting %64.2%

28.0%Turnover Rate18.5%

21.9%Free Throw Rate50.8%

42.2%3-Point Rate47.5%

0.55Assist / Turnover1.33

Game Summary

Cincinnati won by 31 points. The game played at approximately 80.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.