Niagara

8-22

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

10.3%Niagara

89.7%Duquesne

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADDuquesne -15.3

PROJECTED TOTAL144.9

MODEL MONEYLINEDuquesne -871

Duquesne

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNiagara 65

Projected Total144.9

Projected ScoreDuquesne 80

Team Comparison

NiagaraMetricDuquesne

35.8MMH Power Index50.7

100.8Offensive Efficiency110.6

112.4Defensive Efficiency106.2

-11.6Net Efficiency4.4

-0.8Strength of Schedule0.6

-5.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.9

63.4Tempo70.8

50.9%Effective FG%53.4%

18.8%Turnover Rate17.7%

24.9%Offensive Rebound %30.6%

27.3%Free Throw Rate38.2%

-7.4Average Margin3.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Duquesne HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDuquesne holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.7–35.8), offensive efficiency (110.6–100.8), defensive efficiency (106.2–112.4), net efficiency (4.4–-11.6).

Niagara COUNTERS WITHrecent form (-5.6–-5.9).

Final

Niagara

63—83

Duquesne

Duquesne by 20 • 71.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

NiagaraTEAM STATDuquesne

20-48FG31-55

42.0%FG%56.0%

2-143PT11-26

14.0%3PT%42.0%

21-27FT10-13

78.0%FT%77.0%

25Rebounds32

6Offensive Rebounds7

6Assists18

16Turnovers17

10Steals8

4Blocks4

15Fouls26

Player Box Score

Niagara

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Reggie Prudhomme	G	28	6-9	2-4	2-2	2	0	1	0	16
Justin Page	G	25	4-9	0-2	6-7	2	2	1	0	14
Brian Griffith	G	17	1-6	0-1	6-6	3	0	0	0	8
Justin Hawkins	F	20	3-5	0-1	1-2	3	0	2	1	7
Josiah Sabino	G	26	2-3	0-0	1-2	3	2	3	0	5
Trenton Walters	G	16	0-3	0-1	5-6	3	2	0	1	5
Vice Zanki	F	21	2-7	0-4	0-0	0	0	0	0	4
Kabeya Tshibangu	C	18	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	2
Will Shortt	F	12	1-3	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	2	2
Landon Williams	G	9	0-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	0
Drew Larson	F	8	0-0	0-0	0-2	1	0	1	0	0

Duquesne

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tarence Guinyard	G	24	6-8	4-6	3-4	3	5	1	0	19
Jimmie Williams	G	25	6-10	3-6	0-0	2	4	3	0	15
John Hugley IV	F	25	3-6	1-1	0-0	8	1	0	1	7
Cam Crawford	G	18	2-6	1-5	2-2	3	1	0	0	7
Lazar Milosevic	F	6	2-2	0-0	3-4	2	0	0	0	7
David Dixon	F	16	3-3	0-0	0-0	3	1	1	0	6
Dom Aekins	G	14	3-6	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	6
Brandon Hall	G	11	2-2	2-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	6
Maximus Edwards	G	20	2-7	0-3	0-0	3	5	1	0	4
Stef van Bussel	C	9	1-1	0-0	2-3	1	0	0	1	4
Jakub Necas	F	21	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	2	2
Alex Williams	F	4	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Lucas Prolla	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0
Seamus McDermott	G	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Ethan Anish	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.0Possessions71.0

88.7Offensive Efficiency116.9

116.9Defensive Efficiency88.7

-28.2Net Efficiency28.2

43.8%Effective FG%66.4%

51.8%True Shooting %67.8%

22.6%Turnover Rate23.9%

56.3%Free Throw Rate23.6%

29.2%3-Point Rate47.3%

0.38Assist / Turnover1.06

Game Summary

Duquesne won by 20 points. The game played at approximately 71.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.