New Hampshire

9-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

3.2%New Hampshire

96.8%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -21.7

PROJECTED TOTAL139.6

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -3025

Clemson

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNew Hampshire 59

Projected Total139.6

Projected ScoreClemson 81

Team Comparison

New HampshireMetricClemson

34MMH Power Index59.9

99.6Offensive Efficiency112.6

107.5Defensive Efficiency101.4

-7.9Net Efficiency11.2

-3.4Strength of Schedule4.6

-17.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

69.4Tempo63.6

47.6%Effective FG%53.0%

16.1%Turnover Rate14.0%

26.7%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

29.4%Free Throw Rate38.1%

-5.5Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY96.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

11–0

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–34.0), offensive efficiency (112.6–99.6), defensive efficiency (101.4–107.5), net efficiency (11.2–-7.9).

Final

New Hampshire

38—88

Clemson

Clemson by 50 • 69.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

New HampshireTEAM STATClemson

15-60FG26-51

25.0%FG%51.0%

4-273PT6-19

15.0%3PT%32.0%

4-9FT30-41

44.0%FT%73.0%

30Rebounds45

8Offensive Rebounds7

7Assists13

13Turnovers6

4Steals2

1Blocks4

28Fouls15

Player Box Score

New Hampshire

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Comeh Emuobor	G	17	4-9	2-4	1-2	2	0	0	0	11
KiJan Robinson	G	28	4-13	0-5	1-1	1	3	0	0	9
Giannos Xanthopoulos	C	15	3-4	0-1	2-3	3	0	1	0	8
R.J. Kennedy	G	18	1-7	1-4	0-0	0	1	0	0	3
Dylan Saunders	F	4	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Jack Graham	G	26	1-7	0-3	0-2	1	1	0	1	2
Jon O'Neill	F	6	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	2
Davide Poser	F	32	0-5	0-4	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
John Squire	F	20	0-1	0-0	0-0	6	0	1	0	0
Belal El Shakery	F	18	0-10	0-4	0-0	7	2	1	0	0
Tyler Bike	G	10	0-2	0-1	0-1	0	0	1	0	0
Myles Blackley	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Antoni Siewruk	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ace Buckner	G	20	6-7	0-1	6-7	3	2	0	1	18
Jake Wahlin	F	17	3-4	2-2	3-3	4	1	0	0	11
Nick Davidson	F	20	3-4	1-1	3-4	5	1	0	1	10
Carter Welling	F	15	4-5	0-1	2-6	5	2	0	0	10
RJ Godfrey	F	22	4-6	0-1	1-2	9	3	0	0	9
Jestin Porter	G	19	1-5	1-3	5-7	5	3	0	0	8
Dillon Hunter	G	20	2-7	1-5	2-2	0	1	0	0	7
Zac Foster	G	16	2-7	0-2	2-2	3	0	1	2	6
Butta Johnson	G	17	1-3	1-2	2-2	1	0	1	0	5
Dallas Thomas	F	11	0-2	0-1	2-4	2	0	0	0	2
Trent Steinour	F	5	0-1	0-0	2-2	2	0	0	0	2
Chase Thompson	F	18	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.4Possessions69.4

54.8Offensive Efficiency126.8

126.8Defensive Efficiency54.8

-72.0Net Efficiency72.0

28.3%Effective FG%56.9%

29.6%True Shooting %62.4%

18.8%Turnover Rate8.6%

15.0%Free Throw Rate80.4%

45.0%3-Point Rate37.3%

0.54Assist / Turnover2.17

Game Summary

Clemson won by 50 points. The game played at approximately 69.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.