Long Island University

24-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

38.9%Long Island University

61.1%Notre Dame

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNotre Dame -3.6

PROJECTED TOTAL149.6

MODEL MONEYLINENotre Dame -157

Notre Dame

13-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLong Island University 73

Projected Total149.6

Projected ScoreNotre Dame 77

Team Comparison

Long Island UniversityMetricNotre Dame

50.2MMH Power Index49.7

107.6Offensive Efficiency110.3

104.8Defensive Efficiency111.2

2.8Net Efficiency-0.9

-1.3Strength of Schedule4.7

4.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.6

68.5Tempo68.0

53.0%Effective FG%53.0%

18.9%Turnover Rate17.0%

33.6%Offensive Rebound %31.4%

34.9%Free Throw Rate34.7%

1.9Average Margin-0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Long Island University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY61.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLong Island University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.2–49.7), defensive efficiency (104.8–111.2), net efficiency (2.8–-0.9), recent form (4.1–-11.6).

Notre Dame COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.3–107.6), strength of schedule (4.7–-1.3), ball security (17.0–18.9).

Final

Long Island University

67—89

Notre Dame

Notre Dame by 22 • 71.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Long Island UniversityTEAM STATNotre Dame

21-55FG27-55

38.0%FG%49.0%

6-183PT14-27

33.0%3PT%52.0%

19-31FT21-30

61.0%FT%70.0%

31Rebounds45

14Offensive Rebounds17

12Assists15

15Turnovers19

10Steals7

3Blocks1

22Fouls24

Player Box Score

Long Island University

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Mason Porter-Brown	F	36	3-8	1-2	5-6	4	1	1	1	12
Jamal Fuller	G	29	3-8	3-6	3-4	5	2	0	0	12
Greg Gordon	G	35	5-12	0-0	1-2	7	7	4	0	11
Isaiah Miranda	F	16	4-11	0-3	2-4	0	0	0	0	10
Jomo Goings	G	32	2-6	1-3	3-6	7	1	4	0	8
Shadrak Lasu	F	23	2-2	1-1	3-5	4	1	0	2	8
Malachi Davis	G	24	2-8	0-3	1-2	1	0	1	0	5
Faheim Meran	G	5	0-0	0-0	1-2	0	0	0	0	1

Notre Dame

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Markus Burton	G	27	7-13	2-4	8-9	1	1	0	0	24
Cole Certa	G	25	6-10	6-9	4-4	4	2	0	0	22
Ryder Frost	F	14	5-6	4-5	1-2	2	1	0	0	15
Kebba Njie	F	11	2-3	0-0	4-4	4	0	0	0	8
Garrett Sundra	F	20	2-4	1-3	0-0	2	0	1	0	5
Sir Mohammed	G	17	1-3	1-2	2-4	1	1	1	0	5
Jalen Haralson	F	12	2-7	0-1	0-1	3	0	0	0	4
Carson Towt	F	29	1-4	0-0	0-0	19	3	2	1	2
Braeden Shrewsberry	G	18	1-4	0-2	0-0	0	3	1	0	2
Logan Imes	G	20	0-0	0-0	1-4	3	3	2	0	1
Brady Koehler	F	7	0-1	0-1	1-2	2	1	0	0	1

Advanced Game Stats

71.0Possessions71.0

94.4Offensive Efficiency125.4

125.4Defensive Efficiency94.4

-31.0Net Efficiency31.0

43.6%Effective FG%61.8%

48.0%True Shooting %64.3%

21.2%Turnover Rate26.7%

56.4%Free Throw Rate54.5%

32.7%3-Point Rate49.1%

0.80Assist / Turnover0.79

Game Summary

Notre Dame won by 22 points. The game played at approximately 71.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.