Mississippi Valley State

3-30

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

1.0%Mississippi Valley State

99.0%UAB

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUAB -32.2

PROJECTED TOTAL152.2

MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -9900

UAB

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMississippi Valley State 60

Projected Total152.2

Projected ScoreUAB 92

Team Comparison

Mississippi Valley StateMetricUAB

17.7MMH Power Index56.9

91.1Offensive Efficiency110.5

117.8Defensive Efficiency102.9

-26.7Net Efficiency7.6

-4.1Strength of Schedule0.4

-17.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9

70.5Tempo71.7

45.8%Effective FG%48.8%

21.8%Turnover Rate12.4%

26.5%Offensive Rebound %32.7%

34.5%Free Throw Rate36.9%

-18.8Average Margin5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UAB HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY99.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

11–0

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–17.7), offensive efficiency (110.5–91.1), defensive efficiency (102.9–117.8), net efficiency (7.6–-26.7).

Final

Mississippi Valley State

55—106

UAB

UAB by 51 • 84.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Mississippi Valley StateTEAM STATUAB

16-55FG37-74

29.0%FG%50.0%

5-213PT9-26

24.0%3PT%35.0%

18-19FT23-37

95.0%FT%62.0%

34Rebounds49

5Offensive Rebounds15

9Assists18

26Turnovers8

8Steals17

4Blocks1

23Fouls15

Player Box Score

Mississippi Valley State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Michael James	G	33	6-18	3-11	10-10	3	2	4	0	25
Lamont Sams	F	21	3-6	1-3	2-2	5	0	2	1	9
Patrick Punch	G	35	2-9	1-3	3-3	3	1	0	1	8
Tyrone Iroghama	G	16	1-3	0-0	3-4	4	1	0	0	5
Mussa Mzein	C	14	2-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	4
Antonio Sisk	G	31	1-6	0-2	0-0	3	2	2	0	2
Daniel Mayfield	F	19	1-6	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	1	2
Chance Sutton	F	12	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
Delkedric Holmes	G	10	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	2	0	0	0
Samuel Murray	F	9	0-3	0-2	0-0	1	1	0	1	0

UAB

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chance Westry	G	20	8-12	3-5	4-8	5	3	4	0	23
Jacob Meyer	G	23	8-14	1-3	5-7	2	0	2	0	22
Ahmad Robinson	G	27	5-8	2-3	2-4	5	7	3	0	14
Salim London	G	15	3-5	1-3	4-4	2	1	1	0	11
Daniel Rivera	F	20	5-9	0-0	0-2	4	0	0	1	10
KyeRon Lindsay-Martin	F	21	3-6	0-0	2-2	6	1	2	0	8
Evan Chatman	F	22	2-5	1-4	2-5	8	2	1	0	7
Dayjaun Anderson	G	19	2-7	1-6	1-1	3	2	2	0	6
Quaran McPherson	G	7	0-1	0-1	3-4	0	0	1	0	3
Joao Das Chagas	C	13	1-5	0-0	0-0	5	0	0	0	2
Ari Gooch	G	10	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	2	1	0	0
Lance Carr	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

84.8Possessions84.8

64.9Offensive Efficiency125.0

125.0Defensive Efficiency64.9

-60.1Net Efficiency60.1

33.6%Effective FG%56.1%

43.0%True Shooting %57.9%

30.6%Turnover Rate9.5%

34.5%Free Throw Rate50.0%

38.2%3-Point Rate35.1%

0.35Assist / Turnover2.25

Game Summary

UAB won by 51 points. The game played at approximately 84.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.