Lipscomb

18-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

5.5%Lipscomb

94.5%Vanderbilt

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -18.4

PROJECTED TOTAL159.0

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -1718

Vanderbilt

27-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLipscomb 70

Projected Total159.0

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 89

Team Comparison

LipscombMetricVanderbilt

47.9MMH Power Index68.9

111.3Offensive Efficiency120.9

107.6Defensive Efficiency105.7

3.7Net Efficiency15.2

-2.5Strength of Schedule7.4

-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7

68.8Tempo70.9

54.8%Effective FG%55.3%

16.0%Turnover Rate13.5%

25.9%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

26.5%Free Throw Rate39.3%

2.5Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY94.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

11–0

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–47.9), offensive efficiency (120.9–111.3), defensive efficiency (105.7–107.6), net efficiency (15.2–3.7).

Final

Lipscomb

61—105

Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt by 44 • 74.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LipscombTEAM STATVanderbilt

17-56FG38-68

30.0%FG%56.0%

6-263PT17-31

23.0%3PT%55.0%

21-22FT12-17

95.0%FT%71.0%

34Rebounds37

9Offensive Rebounds8

8Assists24

18Turnovers6

3Steals13

1Blocks6

16Fouls19

Player Box Score

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ross Candelino	G	30	6-11	3-7	0-0	4	0	1	0	15
Titas Sargiunas	F	22	4-11	1-6	5-5	5	1	0	0	14
Cole Middleton	F	22	1-4	1-1	6-6	5	1	0	0	9
Kennedy Okpara	F	15	3-5	1-3	0-0	1	0	0	0	7
Ethan Duncan	G	25	1-7	0-3	3-3	2	0	0	0	5
Or Ashkenazi	F	13	1-1	0-0	2-2	3	1	0	0	4
Grant Asman	F	24	0-5	0-4	3-4	6	2	2	1	3
Charlie Williams	C	19	0-4	0-1	2-2	2	0	0	0	2
Kellan Boylan	F	9	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Mateo Esmeraldo	G	21	0-7	0-1	0-0	0	3	0	0	0

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyler Nickel	F	24	7-12	6-9	0-0	2	1	1	0	20
Tyler Tanner	G	24	6-10	4-5	2-2	2	1	4	3	18
AK Okereke	F	22	5-7	2-2	4-4	0	1	0	0	16
Tyler Harris	F	23	6-9	2-5	1-1	4	2	0	1	15
Duke Miles	G	25	3-7	2-5	2-2	4	9	3	0	10
Jalen Washington	C	17	3-4	0-0	3-4	2	2	0	1	9
Devin McGlockton	F	23	3-5	0-1	0-0	12	2	0	1	6
Frankie Collins	G	18	2-5	0-1	0-2	4	6	4	0	4
Jaylon Dean-Vines	G	4	2-2	0-0	0-1	2	0	1	0	4
Miles Keeffe	G	2	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Mike James	G	8	0-5	0-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Chandler Bing	G	5	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Jayden Leverett	C	4	0-0	0-0	0-1	0	0	0	0	0
Coleson Messer	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

74.8Possessions74.8

81.6Offensive Efficiency140.4

140.4Defensive Efficiency81.6

-58.8Net Efficiency58.8

35.7%Effective FG%68.4%

45.9%True Shooting %69.0%

23.9%Turnover Rate8.1%

39.3%Free Throw Rate25.0%

46.4%3-Point Rate45.6%

0.44Assist / Turnover4.00

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 44 points. The game played at approximately 74.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.