
Hofstra
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
43.4%Hofstra
56.6%UCF
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUCF -1.6
PROJECTED TOTAL152.7
MODEL MONEYLINEUCF -130

UCF
21-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 76
Projected Total152.7
Projected ScoreUCF 77
Team Comparison
59.3MMH Power Index57.1
114.0Offensive Efficiency113.3
100.9Defensive Efficiency110.0
13.1Net Efficiency3.3
-2.9Strength of Schedule6.6
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.8
66.2Tempo71.2
52.2%Effective FG%53.0%
16.1%Turnover Rate16.0%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %34.3%
32.0%Free Throw Rate31.1%
8.7Average Margin2.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–57.1), offensive efficiency (114.0–113.3), defensive efficiency (100.9–110.0), net efficiency (13.1–3.3).
UCF COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (6.6–-2.9), shooting efficiency (53.0–52.2), ball security (16.0–16.1).