
UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
29.8%UT Rio Grande Valley
70.2%Baylor
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBaylor -5.8
PROJECTED TOTAL153.8
MODEL MONEYLINEBaylor -236

Baylor
16-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 74
Projected Total153.8
Projected ScoreBaylor 80
Team Comparison
55.8MMH Power Index58.9
112.6Offensive Efficiency116.7
103.1Defensive Efficiency109.5
9.5Net Efficiency7.2
-1.9Strength of Schedule4.0
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.2
67.4Tempo69.7
55.7%Effective FG%54.4%
17.9%Turnover Rate16.4%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %37.5%
29.6%Free Throw Rate34.8%
6.4Average Margin5.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Baylor HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY70.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBaylor holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.9–55.8), offensive efficiency (116.7–112.6), strength of schedule (4.0–-1.9), ball security (16.4–17.9).
UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.1–109.5), net efficiency (9.5–7.2), recent form (12.3–-2.2).