
Samford
18-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
64.2%Samford
35.8%Tulane
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSamford -2.4
PROJECTED TOTAL153.2
MODEL MONEYLINESamford -179

Tulane
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSamford 78
Projected Total153.2
Projected ScoreTulane 75
Team Comparison
54.1MMH Power Index44.3
113.5Offensive Efficiency105.3
108.3Defensive Efficiency109.9
5.2Net Efficiency-4.6
-2.9Strength of Schedule2.7
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3
69.5Tempo68.7
54.0%Effective FG%49.6%
13.3%Turnover Rate15.6%
25.3%Offensive Rebound %22.8%
42.5%Free Throw Rate44.8%
3.6Average Margin-3.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Samford HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY64.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSamford holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.1–44.3), offensive efficiency (113.5–105.3), defensive efficiency (108.3–109.9), net efficiency (5.2–-4.6).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-2.9), free throw rate (44.8–42.5).