
UT Martin
22-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
30.1%UT Martin
69.9%UNLV
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUNLV -4.1
PROJECTED TOTAL145.8
MODEL MONEYLINEUNLV -232

UNLV
18-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Martin 71
Projected Total145.8
Projected ScoreUNLV 75
Team Comparison
49.8MMH Power Index52.8
103.8Offensive Efficiency111.0
94.0Defensive Efficiency109.6
9.8Net Efficiency1.4
-4.8Strength of Schedule2.7
-0.8Last 10 Net Efficiency1.1
67.2Tempo71.4
49.5%Effective FG%53.7%
21.4%Turnover Rate17.2%
37.9%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
37.5%Free Throw Rate41.6%
6.6Average Margin1.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UNLV HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY69.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUNLV holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.8–49.8), offensive efficiency (111.0–103.8), strength of schedule (2.7–-4.8), recent form (1.1–-0.8).
UT Martin COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (94.0–109.6), net efficiency (9.8–1.4), offensive rebounding (37.9–30.8).