
Rider
4-25GAME THAT MATTERSAT
8.5%Rider
91.5%Rutgers
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADRutgers -15.1
PROJECTED TOTAL142.8
MODEL MONEYLINERutgers -1076

Rutgers
13-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRider 64
Projected Total142.8
Projected ScoreRutgers 79
Team Comparison
29.1MMH Power Index45.9
96.3Offensive Efficiency104.2
115.3Defensive Efficiency112.2
-19.0Net Efficiency-8.0
-0.9Strength of Schedule3.9
-17.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.6
65.9Tempo67.4
43.4%Effective FG%47.4%
17.1%Turnover Rate15.0%
32.8%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
31.5%Free Throw Rate36.3%
-12.6Average Margin-5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Rutgers HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY91.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMRutgers holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.9–29.1), offensive efficiency (104.2–96.3), defensive efficiency (112.2–115.3), net efficiency (-8.0–-19.0).
Rider COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (32.8–29.2).