Alabama A&M logo

Alabama A&M

18-15
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
9.3%Alabama A&M
90.7%Indiana
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADIndiana -15.2
PROJECTED TOTAL148.8
MODEL MONEYLINEIndiana -975
Indiana logo

Indiana

18-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 67
Projected Total148.8
Projected ScoreIndiana 82

Team Comparison

42.3MMH Power Index58.2
105.9Offensive Efficiency116.0
106.6Defensive Efficiency107.1
-0.7Net Efficiency8.9
-6.8Strength of Schedule5.2
3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.7
68.0Tempo67.4
49.7%Effective FG%56.0%
16.8%Turnover Rate15.1%
28.0%Offensive Rebound %26.7%
45.7%Free Throw Rate35.8%
-0.5Average Margin6.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Indiana HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY90.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMIndiana holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.2–42.3), offensive efficiency (116.0–105.9), net efficiency (8.9–-0.7), strength of schedule (5.2–-6.8).
Alabama A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.6–107.1), recent form (3.3–-7.7), offensive rebounding (28.0–26.7).
Final
Alabama A&M logo
Alabama A&M
51—98
Indiana logo
Indiana
Indiana by 47 • 70.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Alabama A&MTEAM STATIndiana
18-53FG36-58
34.0%FG%62.0%
5-153PT10-24
33.0%3PT%42.0%
10-19FT16-16
53.0%FT%100.0%
19Rebounds42
3Offensive Rebounds6
9Assists23
11Turnovers11
6Steals7
2Blocks2
16Fouls18

Player Box Score

Alabama A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Lou HutchinsonG235-54-41-200010015
Kintavious DozierG334-90-14-713200012
Sami PissisG333-100-31-31410007
Koron DavisG253-100-11-19000007
James FlippinF221-101-21-23200004
PJ EasonF131-20-00-00011002
Bilal Abdur-RahmanG110-10-12-40000002
Tajden DavisG31-10-00-00000002
Gabe KincyG210-20-10-01010000
Jalen CarruthG100-30-20-00010000
Angok AnyangF60-00-00-00000000
Indiana
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Reed BaileyF237-90-07-752000021
Lamar WilkersonG277-134-101-122300019
Tucker DeVriesF307-134-80-0114100018
Sam AlexisF206-71-24-483020017
Tayton ConerwayG296-70-12-215200014
Jasai MilesG182-21-10-04100005
Trent SisleyF181-40-10-03200002
Ian StephensG40-00-02-20000002
Conor EnrightG230-00-00-03410000
Drew SnivelyG40-20-00-02000000
Tryce GrensingG40-10-10-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

70.3Possessions70.3
72.5Offensive Efficiency139.4
139.4Defensive Efficiency72.5
-66.9Net Efficiency66.9
38.7%Effective FG%70.7%
41.1%True Shooting %74.7%
15.7%Turnover Rate15.6%
35.8%Free Throw Rate27.6%
28.3%3-Point Rate41.4%
0.82Assist / Turnover2.09
Game Summary
Indiana won by 47 points. The game played at approximately 70.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.