
Northeastern
8-23GAME THAT MATTERSAT
20.0%Northeastern
80.0%Colgate
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -10.1
PROJECTED TOTAL156.2
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -400

Colgate
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNortheastern 73
Projected Total156.2
Projected ScoreColgate 83
Team Comparison
40.9MMH Power Index48.8
107.1Offensive Efficiency111.7
115.7Defensive Efficiency109.0
-8.6Net Efficiency2.7
2.7Strength of Schedule-2.0
-14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.3
69.9Tempo68.4
52.7%Effective FG%54.5%
16.4%Turnover Rate14.8%
27.0%Offensive Rebound %26.9%
29.9%Free Throw Rate30.0%
-6.0Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Colgate HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY80.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.8–40.9), offensive efficiency (111.7–107.1), defensive efficiency (109.0–115.7), net efficiency (2.7–-8.6).
Northeastern COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-2.0), offensive rebounding (27.0–26.9).