
Cornell
15-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
41.3%Cornell
58.7%Kent State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKent State -3.7
PROJECTED TOTAL174.3
MODEL MONEYLINEKent State -142

Kent State
24-10MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCornell 85
Projected Total174.3
Projected ScoreKent State 89
Team Comparison
56.1MMH Power Index54.7
121.5Offensive Efficiency113.9
114.6Defensive Efficiency107.6
6.9Net Efficiency6.3
-1.1Strength of Schedule-0.1
7.6Last 10 Net Efficiency2.1
72.8Tempo74.0
60.1%Effective FG%53.0%
16.0%Turnover Rate17.7%
31.1%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
29.7%Free Throw Rate43.5%
5.1Average Margin4.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Cornell HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY58.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCornell holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.1–54.7), offensive efficiency (121.5–113.9), net efficiency (6.9–6.3), recent form (7.6–2.1).
Kent State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.6–114.6), strength of schedule (-0.1–-1.1), offensive rebounding (35.0–31.1).