
Longwood
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
28.9%Longwood
71.1%Pittsburgh
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPittsburgh -5.4
PROJECTED TOTAL148.4
MODEL MONEYLINEPittsburgh -246

Pittsburgh
13-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLongwood 72
Projected Total148.4
Projected ScorePittsburgh 77
Team Comparison
47MMH Power Index50.5
108.1Offensive Efficiency108.4
103.0Defensive Efficiency110.4
5.1Net Efficiency-2.0
-6.4Strength of Schedule5.5
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.9
71.9Tempo65.0
51.4%Effective FG%51.4%
19.3%Turnover Rate17.3%
35.4%Offensive Rebound %33.1%
42.0%Free Throw Rate31.2%
3.6Average Margin-1.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Longwood HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY71.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLongwood holds the advantage in defensive efficiency (103.0–110.4), net efficiency (5.1–-2.0), recent form (2.3–-6.9), offensive rebounding (35.4–33.1).
Pittsburgh COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (50.5–47.0), offensive efficiency (108.4–108.1), strength of schedule (5.5–-6.4).