Gardner-Webb

4-29

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

1.4%Gardner-Webb

98.6%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -28.9

PROJECTED TOTAL145.6

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -7043

Clemson

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGardner-Webb 58

Projected Total145.6

Projected ScoreClemson 87

Team Comparison

Gardner-WebbMetricClemson

26.6MMH Power Index59.9

96.0Offensive Efficiency112.6

120.4Defensive Efficiency101.4

-24.4Net Efficiency11.2

3.3Strength of Schedule4.6

-18.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

71.0Tempo63.6

48.8%Effective FG%53.0%

19.2%Turnover Rate14.0%

23.6%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

31.5%Free Throw Rate38.1%

-17.3Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY98.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

11–0

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–26.6), offensive efficiency (112.6–96.0), defensive efficiency (101.4–120.4), net efficiency (11.2–-24.4).

Final

Gardner-Webb

59—97

Clemson

Clemson by 38 • 70.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Gardner-WebbTEAM STATClemson

18-47FG37-77

38.0%FG%48.0%

6-203PT10-36

30.0%3PT%28.0%

17-26FT13-20

65.0%FT%65.0%

28Rebounds47

6Offensive Rebounds19

8Assists25

16Turnovers3

2Steals9

1Blocks3

18Fouls16

Player Box Score

Gardner-Webb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jacob Hudson	G	32	2-8	0-3	7-11	7	2	0	0	11
Spence Sims	G	27	4-6	3-5	0-0	0	0	0	0	11
Julius Clark	G	17	2-3	1-1	4-6	2	0	0	0	9
NaVuan Peterson	F	22	3-9	1-5	0-0	5	2	1	0	7
DJ Jefferson	G	16	3-7	0-1	0-0	1	1	1	0	6
Ace Talbert	G	20	1-5	1-3	2-2	1	2	0	0	5
Jacob Hogarth	F	18	1-3	0-0	3-3	7	0	0	0	5
Jamias Ferere	G	3	1-1	0-0	1-2	0	0	0	0	3
Colin Hawkins	G	20	1-2	0-0	0-2	0	0	0	0	2
Riek Riek	F	13	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Curtis Williams III	G	12	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	1	0

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Nick Davidson	F	22	6-10	1-3	5-8	6	2	2	0	18
Carter Welling	F	15	6-9	1-1	1-3	11	0	0	0	14
RJ Godfrey	F	23	5-5	0-0	3-3	6	3	2	1	13
Ace Buckner	G	16	5-11	1-5	0-0	2	3	0	0	11
Jestin Porter	G	17	3-11	3-8	0-0	5	3	0	0	9
Dillon Hunter	G	21	3-7	1-4	0-0	4	2	2	0	7
Butta Johnson	G	20	3-7	1-5	0-0	1	2	0	0	7
Jake Wahlin	F	18	3-5	0-2	0-0	2	2	0	1	6
Chase Thompson	F	18	1-3	1-2	2-4	2	3	2	1	5
Dallas Thomas	F	4	2-3	1-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	5
Zac Foster	G	24	0-6	0-5	2-2	5	5	1	0	2
Trent Steinour	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.0Possessions70.0

84.3Offensive Efficiency138.6

138.6Defensive Efficiency84.3

-54.3Net Efficiency54.3

44.7%Effective FG%54.5%

49.7%True Shooting %56.1%

23.1%Turnover Rate4.3%

55.3%Free Throw Rate26.0%

42.6%3-Point Rate46.8%

0.50Assist / Turnover8.33

Game Summary

Clemson won by 38 points. The game played at approximately 70.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.