UMBC logo

UMBC

24-8
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
35.5%UMBC
64.5%Dayton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDayton -4.4
PROJECTED TOTAL141.0
MODEL MONEYLINEDayton -182
Dayton logo

Dayton

25-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUMBC 68
Projected Total141.0
Projected ScoreDayton 73

Team Comparison

59.1MMH Power Index59.9
113.0Offensive Efficiency108.5
99.0Defensive Efficiency101.5
14.0Net Efficiency7.0
-5.6Strength of Schedule5.7
24.7Last 10 Net Efficiency6.4
65.5Tempo68.3
54.3%Effective FG%52.0%
14.3%Turnover Rate16.9%
25.2%Offensive Rebound %26.7%
34.1%Free Throw Rate47.6%
9.1Average Margin4.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UMBC HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY64.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUMBC holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (113.0–108.5), defensive efficiency (99.0–101.5), net efficiency (14.0–7.0), recent form (24.7–6.4).
Dayton COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (59.9–59.1), strength of schedule (5.7–-5.6), offensive rebounding (26.7–25.2).
Final
UMBC logo
UMBC
71—77
Dayton logo
Dayton
Dayton by 6 • 66.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UMBCTEAM STATDayton
26-58FG26-51
45.0%FG%51.0%
11-263PT6-19
42.0%3PT%32.0%
8-10FT19-24
80.0%FT%79.0%
31Rebounds27
11Offensive Rebounds6
13Assists15
15Turnovers9
5Steals10
3Blocks4
17Fouls11

Player Box Score

UMBC
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jose Roberto TanchynF236-74-40-061000016
DJ Armstrong Jr.G345-83-62-223210015
Jah'Likai KingG364-162-94-651110014
Ace ValentineG334-112-62-244000012
Daylon DickersonF285-80-00-052110010
Tim EzeF111-10-00-01010002
Devin CeaserG61-30-00-00000002
Riley JacobsF170-30-10-04200000
Paul GreeneF120-10-00-00000000
Dayton
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Javon BennettG365-121-35-637100016
Keonte JonesG375-52-20-031520012
De'Shayne MontgomeryG334-101-52-262210011
Amaël L'EtangF213-71-24-461000011
Jacob ConnerF164-61-31-120000010
Jaiun SimonF192-30-03-52120007
Jordan DerkackG212-40-11-23200005
Bryce HeardG131-30-23-41100005
Malcolm ThomasF40-10-10-00001000

Advanced Game Stats

66.1Possessions66.1
107.4Offensive Efficiency116.5
116.5Defensive Efficiency107.4
-9.1Net Efficiency9.1
54.3%Effective FG%56.9%
56.6%True Shooting %61.7%
22.5%Turnover Rate13.8%
17.2%Free Throw Rate47.1%
44.8%3-Point Rate37.3%
0.87Assist / Turnover1.67
Game Summary
Dayton won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 66.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.