
UMBC
24-8GAME THAT MATTERSAT
35.5%UMBC
64.5%Dayton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDayton -4.4
PROJECTED TOTAL141.0
MODEL MONEYLINEDayton -182

Dayton
25-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUMBC 68
Projected Total141.0
Projected ScoreDayton 73
Team Comparison
59.1MMH Power Index59.9
113.0Offensive Efficiency108.5
99.0Defensive Efficiency101.5
14.0Net Efficiency7.0
-5.6Strength of Schedule5.7
24.7Last 10 Net Efficiency6.4
65.5Tempo68.3
54.3%Effective FG%52.0%
14.3%Turnover Rate16.9%
25.2%Offensive Rebound %26.7%
34.1%Free Throw Rate47.6%
9.1Average Margin4.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UMBC HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY64.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUMBC holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (113.0–108.5), defensive efficiency (99.0–101.5), net efficiency (14.0–7.0), recent form (24.7–6.4).
Dayton COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (59.9–59.1), strength of schedule (5.7–-5.6), offensive rebounding (26.7–25.2).