Vanderbilt

27-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

69.1%Vanderbilt

30.9%UCF

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -4.6

PROJECTED TOTAL164.2

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -224

UCF

21-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 84

Projected Total164.2

Projected ScoreUCF 80

Team Comparison

VanderbiltMetricUCF

68.9MMH Power Index57.1

120.9Offensive Efficiency113.3

105.7Defensive Efficiency110.0

15.2Net Efficiency3.3

7.4Strength of Schedule6.6

2.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.8

70.9Tempo71.2

55.3%Effective FG%53.0%

13.5%Turnover Rate16.0%

30.8%Offensive Rebound %34.3%

39.3%Free Throw Rate31.1%

10.8Average Margin2.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY69.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–57.1), offensive efficiency (120.9–113.3), defensive efficiency (105.7–110.0), net efficiency (15.2–3.3).

UCF COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (34.3–30.8).

Final

Vanderbilt

105—93

UCF

Vanderbilt by 12 • 74.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

VanderbiltTEAM STATUCF

38-68FG31-58

56.0%FG%53.0%

14-363PT9-16

39.0%3PT%56.0%

15-17FT22-28

88.0%FT%79.0%

29Rebounds29

9Offensive Rebounds8

18Assists16

6Turnovers12

7Steals—

3Blocks1

25Fouls19

Player Box Score

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Duke Miles	G	29	8-13	3-7	1-1	0	3	1	0	20
Tyler Nickel	F	32	6-10	4-8	1-1	4	2	0	0	17
Frankie Collins	G	28	5-8	1-3	6-7	5	5	3	0	17
Tyler Tanner	G	24	5-11	3-7	4-4	3	4	2	0	17
Tyler Harris	F	23	6-12	2-6	0-0	3	0	0	1	14
AK Okereke	F	16	3-4	1-1	0-0	0	2	1	1	7
Jalen Washington	C	19	3-5	0-1	0-0	6	1	0	0	6
Devin McGlockton	F	20	2-4	0-2	0-0	6	1	0	1	4
Chandler Bing	G	4	0-0	0-0	3-4	0	0	0	0	3
Jayden Leverett	C	5	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

UCF

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	BLK	PTS
Riley Kugel	G	34	9-19	4-5	3-3	5	4	0	25
Chris Johnson	G	15	5-8	3-4	4-6	0	5	0	17
Jamichael Stillwell	F	18	5-8	0-0	5-7	6	0	0	15
Devan Cambridge	F	31	4-7	0-2	4-6	5	2	0	12
Jordan Burks	F	27	2-3	1-1	2-2	2	0	1	7
Carmelo Pacheco	G	20	2-4	1-3	0-0	3	0	0	5
Themus Fulks	G	19	1-3	0-1	2-2	1	4	0	4
George Beale Jr.	G	9	2-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	4
Jeremy Foumena	C	8	1-4	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	2
Kris Parker	G	7	0-0	0-0	2-2	1	1	0	2
John Bol	C	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0
Elijah Hulsewe	C	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

74.2Possessions74.2

141.5Offensive Efficiency125.3

125.3Defensive Efficiency141.5

16.2Net Efficiency-16.2

66.2%Effective FG%61.2%

69.0%True Shooting %65.2%

8.2%Turnover Rate15.9%

25.0%Free Throw Rate48.3%

52.9%3-Point Rate27.6%

3.00Assist / Turnover1.33

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 74.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.