East Texas A&M logo

East Texas A&M

11-21
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
8.0%East Texas A&M
92.0%UT Rio Grande Valley
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -16.6
PROJECTED TOTAL145.8
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -1150
UT Rio Grande Valley logo

UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreEast Texas A&M 65
Projected Total145.8
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 81

Team Comparison

38.4MMH Power Index55.8
101.2Offensive Efficiency112.6
107.5Defensive Efficiency103.1
-6.3Net Efficiency9.5
-1.5Strength of Schedule-1.9
-9.1Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3
69.3Tempo67.4
50.7%Effective FG%55.7%
18.7%Turnover Rate17.9%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
31.9%Free Throw Rate29.6%
-4.3Average Margin6.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–38.4), offensive efficiency (112.6–101.2), defensive efficiency (103.1–107.5), net efficiency (9.5–-6.3).
East Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.5–-1.9), free throw rate (31.9–29.6).
Final
East Texas A&M logo
East Texas A&M
55—57
UT Rio Grande Valley logo
UT Rio Grande Valley
UT Rio Grande Valley by 2 • 60.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

East Texas A&MTEAM STATUT Rio Grande Valley
21-56FG20-52
38.0%FG%38.0%
9-273PT7-26
33.0%3PT%27.0%
4-11FT10-22
36.0%FT%45.0%
40Rebounds39
17Offensive Rebounds16
15Assists16
16Turnovers15
9Steals7
2Blocks3
17Fouls16

Player Box Score

East Texas A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tay MosherF214-82-51-140000011
TJ ThomasGuard283-83-60-05111009
Demarco BetheaF223-50-13-86010009
KC UgwuakaziF114-60-00-05120008
Yusef SalihGuard193-81-40-03220007
Evan PhelpsG212-51-20-02200005
Khaliq Abdul-MateenGuard181-51-30-03110003
Scooter WilliamsG141-51-40-11301003
Chris AdlamG240-30-10-13510000
Camerin JamesGuard130-20-10-04010000
Josh TaylorF90-10-00-00000000
UT Rio Grande Valley
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Howie Fleming Jr.G326-101-33-8114000016
Cliff DavisG335-94-81-242000015
Hasan Abdul HakimG312-91-53-41201008
Trey MillerG313-90-12-44220008
DK ThornGuard311-51-40-07321003
K.T. RaimeyGuard101-60-41-20010003
Tommy GankhuyagForward111-10-00-00120002
Kwo AgwaF81-20-00-23001002
Marshal DestremauF90-10-10-02100000
RJ NanceGuard40-00-00-00100000

Advanced Game Stats

60.9Possessions60.9
90.3Offensive Efficiency93.6
93.6Defensive Efficiency90.3
-3.3Net Efficiency3.3
45.5%Effective FG%45.2%
44.9%True Shooting %45.6%
26.6%Turnover Rate24.4%
19.6%Free Throw Rate42.3%
48.2%3-Point Rate50.0%
0.94Assist / Turnover1.07
Game Summary
UT Rio Grande Valley won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 60.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.