
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
20.3%Queens University
79.7%Villanova
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVillanova -10.4
PROJECTED TOTAL162.1
MODEL MONEYLINEVillanova -393

Villanova
24-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 76
Projected Total162.1
Projected ScoreVillanova 86
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index59.4
118.4Offensive Efficiency114.7
117.0Defensive Efficiency105.9
1.4Net Efficiency8.8
0.1Strength of Schedule4.4
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.1
71.4Tempo67.3
56.6%Effective FG%53.9%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.0%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %31.8%
37.6%Free Throw Rate31.4%
0.9Average Margin5.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Villanova HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY79.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVillanova holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.4–51.7), defensive efficiency (105.9–117.0), net efficiency (8.8–1.4), strength of schedule (4.4–0.1).
Queens University COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (118.4–114.7), recent form (1.5–-1.1), shooting efficiency (56.6–53.9).