Weber State logo

Weber State

16-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
54.8%Weber State
45.2%Utah
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWeber State -1.1
PROJECTED TOTAL159.5
MODEL MONEYLINEWeber State -121
Utah logo

Utah

10-22
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWeber State 80
Projected Total159.5
Projected ScoreUtah 79

Team Comparison

50.2MMH Power Index43.9
113.6Offensive Efficiency108.8
108.2Defensive Efficiency115.8
5.4Net Efficiency-7.0
-3.4Strength of Schedule5.1
-1.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-16.3
71.5Tempo68.3
52.6%Effective FG%52.3%
15.5%Turnover Rate16.7%
32.6%Offensive Rebound %28.8%
38.3%Free Throw Rate32.2%
3.9Average Margin-4.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Weber State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY54.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWeber State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.2–43.9), offensive efficiency (113.6–108.8), defensive efficiency (108.2–115.8), net efficiency (5.4–-7.0).
Utah COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.1–-3.4).
Final
Weber State logo
Weber State
89—92
Utah logo
Utah
Utah by 3 • 85.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Weber StateTEAM STATUtah
33-73FG31-77
45.0%FG%40.0%
6-203PT9-32
30.0%3PT%28.0%
17-28FT21-32
61.0%FT%66.0%
52Rebounds49
17Offensive Rebounds19
12Assists12
15Turnovers13
7Steals3
3Blocks6
26Fouls21

Player Box Score

Weber State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jace WhitingG346-111-32-530000015
Trevor HennigG365-132-52-472010014
Malek GommaF326-90-02-361120014
Tijan Saine Jr.G274-111-34-444100013
Viljami VartiainenG292-51-35-843200010
Nigel BurrisF203-70-11-25000007
Edwin Suarez Jr.F182-60-01-211030005
ArDarius GraysonG112-50-10-02100004
David HansenF131-41-40-03100003
Declan CutlerF31-10-00-01000002
Bourgeois TshiloboF11-10-00-02000002
Duce PaschalG10-00-00-00000000
Utah
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Terrence BrownG3713-230-210-1543100036
Don McHenryG348-224-116-761000026
Keanu DawesF314-71-22-4145110011
Jacob PatrickG243-52-40-01001008
Kendyl SandersF292-62-50-28001006
Josh HayesF151-30-02-25002004
Jahki HowardF100-20-11-22000001
Seydou TraoreF350-80-70-03111000
Obomate AbbeyG100-10-00-00200000

Advanced Game Stats

85.3Possessions85.3
104.3Offensive Efficiency107.9
107.9Defensive Efficiency104.3
-3.5Net Efficiency3.5
49.3%Effective FG%46.1%
51.6%True Shooting %49.9%
17.8%Turnover Rate15.1%
38.4%Free Throw Rate41.6%
27.4%3-Point Rate41.6%
0.80Assist / Turnover0.92
Game Summary
Utah won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 85.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.