
Lamar
12-19GAME THAT MATTERSAT
9.6%Lamar
90.4%TCU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTCU -14.0
PROJECTED TOTAL144.8
MODEL MONEYLINETCU -942

TCU
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLamar 65
Projected Total144.8
Projected ScoreTCU 79
Team Comparison
44.1MMH Power Index59.7
105.0Offensive Efficiency110.2
103.8Defensive Efficiency102.7
1.2Net Efficiency7.5
-3.0Strength of Schedule4.6
-8.2Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
66.6Tempo70.2
48.8%Effective FG%50.5%
18.0%Turnover Rate15.3%
35.5%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
28.5%Free Throw Rate38.3%
0.8Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
TCU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY90.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTCU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.7–44.1), offensive efficiency (110.2–105.0), defensive efficiency (102.7–103.8), net efficiency (7.5–1.2).
Lamar COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (35.5–33.6).