
Drexel
17-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
31.7%Drexel
68.3%Colgate
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -5.1
PROJECTED TOTAL143.4
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -215

Colgate
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDrexel 69
Projected Total143.4
Projected ScoreColgate 74
Team Comparison
46.5MMH Power Index48.8
103.6Offensive Efficiency111.7
102.4Defensive Efficiency109.0
1.2Net Efficiency2.7
-0.4Strength of Schedule-2.0
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.3
65.7Tempo68.4
51.3%Effective FG%54.5%
19.1%Turnover Rate14.8%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %26.9%
32.3%Free Throw Rate30.0%
0.8Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Colgate HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY68.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.8–46.5), offensive efficiency (111.7–103.6), net efficiency (2.7–1.2), recent form (-0.3–-4.7).
Drexel COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.4–109.0), strength of schedule (-0.4–-2.0), offensive rebounding (30.7–26.9).