Bucknell

10-23

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

20.1%Bucknell

79.9%Princeton

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPrinceton -9.7

PROJECTED TOTAL142.2

MODEL MONEYLINEPrinceton -398

Princeton

9-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBucknell 66

Projected Total142.2

Projected ScorePrinceton 76

Team Comparison

BucknellMetricPrinceton

35.7MMH Power Index43.5

99.5Offensive Efficiency105.1

112.8Defensive Efficiency110.3

-13.3Net Efficiency-5.2

2.0Strength of Schedule1.7

-11.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.2

67.7Tempo65.2

48.4%Effective FG%50.3%

19.0%Turnover Rate16.9%

26.6%Offensive Rebound %27.5%

30.7%Free Throw Rate35.0%

-8.9Average Margin-3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Princeton HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY79.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPrinceton holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (43.5–35.7), offensive efficiency (105.1–99.5), defensive efficiency (110.3–112.8), net efficiency (-5.2–-13.3).

Bucknell COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.0–1.7).

Final

Bucknell

63—73

Princeton

Princeton by 10 • 68.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BucknellTEAM STATPrinceton

21-51FG22-53

41.0%FG%42.0%

6-203PT10-28

30.0%3PT%36.0%

15-21FT19-29

71.0%FT%66.0%

33Rebounds38

6Offensive Rebounds10

10Assists10

13Turnovers12

8Steals5

2Blocks2

22Fouls20

Player Box Score

Bucknell

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Amon Dörries	C	35	5-11	0-1	2-4	7	2	1	0	12
Achile Spadone	G	34	3-9	0-2	4-4	7	1	2	0	10
Ruot Bijiek	F	25	2-5	1-4	4-4	4	0	2	1	9
Jayden Williams	G	24	2-5	1-2	3-4	1	4	0	0	8
Brandon McCreesh	G	28	3-6	1-4	0-0	2	1	0	1	7
Pat Curtin	G	20	3-10	1-4	0-0	6	1	3	0	7
Quin Berger	G	9	2-3	2-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	6
Grgur Brcic	C	16	1-1	0-0	2-4	4	1	0	0	4
Aleksander Pachucki	G	4	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Josh Fulton	G	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jacob Meachem	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-1	0	0	0	0	0

Princeton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dalen Davis	G	37	8-16	2-4	7-8	3	3	1	0	25
Jackson Hicke	G	36	5-12	2-5	0-0	5	1	1	0	12
Jacob Huggins	F	25	2-5	1-1	6-10	4	4	1	0	11
Jack Stanton	G	34	2-6	2-6	2-2	7	0	0	0	8
CJ Happy	F	15	3-6	2-5	0-1	3	0	0	2	8
Malik Abdullahi	F	25	1-5	0-4	4-8	6	2	0	0	6
Landon Clark	G	18	1-2	1-2	0-0	4	0	2	0	3
Sebastian Whitfield	F	7	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Jacob Hammond	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.4Possessions68.4

92.1Offensive Efficiency106.7

106.7Defensive Efficiency92.1

-14.6Net Efficiency14.6

47.1%Effective FG%50.9%

51.7%True Shooting %54.7%

19.1%Turnover Rate17.4%

41.2%Free Throw Rate54.7%

39.2%3-Point Rate52.8%

0.77Assist / Turnover0.83

Game Summary

Princeton won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 68.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.