Alabama State logo

Alabama State

10-22
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
6.8%Alabama State
93.2%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -17.4
PROJECTED TOTAL154.1
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -1371
UAB logo

UAB

20-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAlabama State 68
Projected Total154.1
Projected ScoreUAB 86

Team Comparison

38MMH Power Index56.9
101.7Offensive Efficiency110.5
107.4Defensive Efficiency102.9
-5.7Net Efficiency7.6
-6.2Strength of Schedule0.4
0.0Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
71.9Tempo71.7
48.2%Effective FG%48.8%
18.2%Turnover Rate12.4%
32.6%Offensive Rebound %32.7%
35.8%Free Throw Rate36.9%
-4.1Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UAB HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY93.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–38.0), offensive efficiency (110.5–101.7), defensive efficiency (102.9–107.4), net efficiency (7.6–-5.7).
Final
Alabama State logo
Alabama State
77—74
UAB logo
UAB
Alabama State by 3 • 74.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Alabama StateTEAM STATUAB
28-65FG29-70
43.0%FG%41.0%
8-253PT2-20
32.0%3PT%10.0%
13-20FT14-18
65.0%FT%78.0%
39Rebounds43
12Offensive Rebounds15
19Assists10
11Turnovers12
11Steals5
3Blocks5
16Fouls18

Player Box Score

Alabama State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Asjon AndersonG314-171-811-1627400020
Micah SimpsonG326-146-110-023100018
Jerquarius StanbackF274-70-10-06312008
Tyler ByrdG173-50-12-28020008
Cameron PalesseG263-40-10-24201006
R'Chaun KingF193-60-00-03000006
Trey MillerG152-41-20-02320005
Mario AndrewsC112-30-00-07000004
Tyler MasonF91-20-00-00010002
Damarien YatesG130-30-10-02100000
UAB
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Chance WestryG2710-162-53-320100025
KyeRon Lindsay-MartinF235-70-04-451110014
Ahmad RobinsonG255-120-52-214100012
Daniel RiveraF293-90-01-38013007
Jacob MeyerG272-80-11-24000005
Quaran McPhersonG111-40-13-42101005
Evan ChatmanF282-60-30-09000004
Dayjaun AndersonG111-50-40-00000002
Salim LondonG150-30-10-04410000
Ari GoochG40-00-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

74.6Possessions74.6
103.2Offensive Efficiency99.2
99.2Defensive Efficiency103.2
4.0Net Efficiency-4.0
49.2%Effective FG%42.9%
51.7%True Shooting %47.1%
15.0%Turnover Rate15.9%
30.8%Free Throw Rate25.7%
38.5%3-Point Rate28.6%
1.73Assist / Turnover0.83
Game Summary
Alabama State won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 74.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, Free Throw Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.