
Merrimack
23-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
62.4%Merrimack
37.6%Tarleton State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -0.9
PROJECTED TOTAL141.4
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -166

Tarleton State
14-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMerrimack 71
Projected Total141.4
Projected ScoreTarleton State 70
Team Comparison
53.7MMH Power Index44.6
106.4Offensive Efficiency103.2
103.2Defensive Efficiency101.6
3.2Net Efficiency1.6
0.7Strength of Schedule-2.3
12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.7
64.4Tempo72.2
49.3%Effective FG%49.0%
14.8%Turnover Rate19.9%
24.7%Offensive Rebound %31.8%
39.5%Free Throw Rate42.8%
2.1Average Margin1.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY62.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–44.6), offensive efficiency (106.4–103.2), net efficiency (3.2–1.6), strength of schedule (0.7–-2.3).
Tarleton State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (101.6–103.2), offensive rebounding (31.8–24.7), free throw rate (42.8–39.5).