Murray State logo

Murray State

20-13
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
18.2%Murray State
81.8%SMU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -10.0
PROJECTED TOTAL167.8
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -449
SMU logo

SMU

20-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMurray State 79
Projected Total167.8
Projected ScoreSMU 89

Team Comparison

53.6MMH Power Index62.5
115.0Offensive Efficiency118.2
111.0Defensive Efficiency109.6
4.0Net Efficiency8.6
3.5Strength of Schedule7.0
-9.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.3
72.3Tempo71.1
54.0%Effective FG%55.7%
16.3%Turnover Rate15.7%
32.7%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
39.1%Free Throw Rate31.3%
2.9Average Margin6.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

SMU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY81.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–53.6), offensive efficiency (118.2–115.0), defensive efficiency (109.6–111.0), net efficiency (8.6–4.0).
Murray State COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (39.1–31.3).
Final
Murray State logo
Murray State
91—102
SMU logo
SMU
SMU by 11 • 81.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Murray StateTEAM STATSMU
32-62FG35-74
52.0%FG%47.0%
9-263PT7-16
35.0%3PT%44.0%
18-24FT25-30
75.0%FT%83.0%
31Rebounds42
8Offensive Rebounds17
18Assists16
15Turnovers11
5Steals10
3Blocks3
25Fouls19

Player Box Score

Murray State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Javon JacksonG248-142-38-821000026
JJ TraynorF216-82-30-121020014
Roman DomonG263-50-25-741100011
Fred KingC255-80-10-082010010
Mason MillerF173-53-50-02110009
Dylan AndersonC133-51-30-04210007
Mathis CourbonG221-31-23-42000006
KJ TennerG172-60-02-41400006
Layne TaylorG251-50-40-03520002
Brayden ShorterG100-30-30-01100000
SMU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Boopie MillerG369-133-57-856310028
B.J. EdwardsG358-171-43-445210020
Jaron Pierre Jr.G265-152-47-852210019
Corey WashingtonF295-90-17-8111100017
Samet YigitogluC325-120-01-281200011
Sam WaltersF132-21-10-01000005
Jermaine O'Neal Jr.F151-50-10-03100002
Mitchell HolmesF80-10-00-02000000
B.J. Davis-RayG60-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

81.4Possessions81.4
111.8Offensive Efficiency125.3
125.3Defensive Efficiency111.8
-13.5Net Efficiency13.5
58.9%Effective FG%52.0%
62.0%True Shooting %57.8%
18.7%Turnover Rate13.4%
38.7%Free Throw Rate40.5%
41.9%3-Point Rate21.6%
1.20Assist / Turnover1.45
Game Summary
SMU won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 81.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.