
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
40.2%Queens University
59.8%Duquesne
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDuquesne -4.7
PROJECTED TOTAL165.4
MODEL MONEYLINEDuquesne -149

Duquesne
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 80
Projected Total165.4
Projected ScoreDuquesne 85
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index50.7
118.4Offensive Efficiency110.6
117.0Defensive Efficiency106.2
1.4Net Efficiency4.4
0.1Strength of Schedule0.6
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.9
71.4Tempo70.8
56.6%Effective FG%53.4%
14.8%Turnover Rate17.7%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %30.6%
37.6%Free Throw Rate38.2%
0.9Average Margin3.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Duquesne HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY59.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDuquesne holds the advantage in defensive efficiency (106.2–117.0), net efficiency (4.4–1.4), strength of schedule (0.6–0.1), offensive rebounding (30.6–29.6).
Queens University COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (51.7–50.7), offensive efficiency (118.4–110.6), recent form (1.5–-5.9).