
Mercyhurst
17-17GAME THAT MATTERSAT
68.6%Mercyhurst
31.4%Canisius
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMercyhurst -4.2
PROJECTED TOTAL133.4
MODEL MONEYLINEMercyhurst -218

Canisius
10-21MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMercyhurst 69
Projected Total133.4
Projected ScoreCanisius 65
Team Comparison
45.5MMH Power Index33.9
105.2Offensive Efficiency97.1
102.2Defensive Efficiency108.8
3.0Net Efficiency-11.7
-5.7Strength of Schedule-1.8
3.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.0
65.9Tempo64.8
50.5%Effective FG%46.8%
14.4%Turnover Rate19.6%
26.8%Offensive Rebound %29.1%
25.4%Free Throw Rate32.4%
2.0Average Margin-7.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Mercyhurst HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY68.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMercyhurst holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.5–33.9), offensive efficiency (105.2–97.1), defensive efficiency (102.2–108.8), net efficiency (3.0–-11.7).
Canisius COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.8–-5.7), offensive rebounding (29.1–26.8), free throw rate (32.4–25.4).