
Central Michigan
10-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
20.9%Central Michigan
79.1%South Alabama
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSouth Alabama -9.9
PROJECTED TOTAL148.7
MODEL MONEYLINESouth Alabama -378

South Alabama
21-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCentral Michigan 69
Projected Total148.7
Projected ScoreSouth Alabama 79
Team Comparison
44MMH Power Index51.4
105.9Offensive Efficiency110.3
111.0Defensive Efficiency103.9
-5.1Net Efficiency6.4
-0.5Strength of Schedule-3.7
1.3Last 10 Net Efficiency3.4
69.3Tempo67.4
52.6%Effective FG%53.2%
18.3%Turnover Rate12.8%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %24.9%
32.9%Free Throw Rate39.8%
-3.5Average Margin4.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
South Alabama HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY79.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSouth Alabama holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.4–44.0), offensive efficiency (110.3–105.9), defensive efficiency (103.9–111.0), net efficiency (6.4–-5.1).
Central Michigan COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.5–-3.7), offensive rebounding (29.6–24.9).