Charleston Southern logo

Charleston Southern

15-17
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
51.8%Charleston Southern
48.2%Alabama A&M
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCharleston Southern -0.2
PROJECTED TOTAL157.0
MODEL MONEYLINECharleston Southern -107
Alabama A&M logo

Alabama A&M

18-15
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCharleston Southern 79
Projected Total157.0
Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 78

Team Comparison

47.5MMH Power Index42.3
110.1Offensive Efficiency105.9
105.7Defensive Efficiency106.6
4.4Net Efficiency-0.7
-3.5Strength of Schedule-6.8
-2.8Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3
75.8Tempo68.0
55.3%Effective FG%49.7%
18.4%Turnover Rate16.8%
30.6%Offensive Rebound %28.0%
30.8%Free Throw Rate45.7%
3.3Average Margin-0.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Charleston Southern HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCharleston Southern holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.5–42.3), offensive efficiency (110.1–105.9), defensive efficiency (105.7–106.6), net efficiency (4.4–-0.7).
Alabama A&M COUNTERS WITHrecent form (3.3–-2.8), ball security (16.8–18.4), free throw rate (45.7–30.8).
Final
Charleston Southern logo
Charleston Southern
64—68
Alabama A&M logo
Alabama A&M
Alabama A&M by 4 • 69.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Charleston SouthernTEAM STATAlabama A&M
23-55FG26-67
42.0%FG%39.0%
7-233PT5-17
30.0%3PT%29.0%
11-19FT11-12
58.0%FT%92.0%
40Rebounds39
14Offensive Rebounds16
12Assists10
18Turnovers14
6Steals10
4Blocks3
16Fouls18

Player Box Score

Charleston Southern
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Brycen BlaineG348-213-123-332000022
Reis JonesF283-80-05-7101020011
Jesse HafemeisterF144-52-20-050200010
Nate BraffordF253-91-50-16012007
A'lahn SumlerG332-61-10-26410005
Jaquias FranklinG302-50-30-01410004
Lase OlalereF111-10-01-21000003
Jacob TaylorG180-00-01-22110001
Trent ColemanF10-00-01-20000001
Armari CarrawayG60-00-00-00000000
Alabama A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Kintavious DozierG369-211-48-861400027
Sami PissisG336-161-40-046300013
PJ EasonF223-40-02-27101008
Koron DavisG313-100-10-04020006
James FlippinF82-72-50-00001006
Peyton Daniels Sr.G111-31-21-22000004
James Graham IIIG261-20-10-04001002
Angok AnyangF81-20-00-02100002
Gabe KincyG130-10-00-04110000
Lou HutchinsonG120-10-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

69.4Possessions69.4
92.2Offensive Efficiency98.0
98.0Defensive Efficiency92.2
-5.8Net Efficiency5.8
48.2%Effective FG%42.5%
50.0%True Shooting %46.8%
26.5%Turnover Rate19.8%
34.5%Free Throw Rate17.9%
41.8%3-Point Rate25.4%
0.67Assist / Turnover0.71
Game Summary
Alabama A&M won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 69.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.